* Re: [gentoo-user] which -march flag to pick for Intel Core 2 Duo in make.conf?
@ 2007-05-24 15:43 99% ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2007-05-24 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 870 bytes --]
On Thu, 24 May 2007 11:13:30 -0400, Denis wrote:
> After reading some docs, the impression I get is that the 'nocona'
> flag is for building a 64-bit system... For a 32-bit system, it seems
> like 'prescott' would be the choice, wouldn't it?
Yes.
> We don't have gcc-4.2.0 in our portage available for installation yet,
> do we? Anyone know when?
When the devs consider it suitable for at least the testing branch or
when you do "echo =sys-devel/gcc-4.2*" >>/etc/portage/package.mask,
whichever comes sooner.
Bear in mind that GCC is almost certainly masked for good reason. It's
not like you're using a binary distro and only need a compiler for a few
packages. Feel free to try it in the knowledge that if it breaks your
system, you get to keep the pieces.
--
Neil Bothwick
Sects, sects, sects, is that all you monks think about?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2007-05-24 13:55 [gentoo-user] which -march flag to pick for Intel Core 2 Duo in make.conf? Denis
2007-05-24 14:17 ` Mark Shields
2007-05-24 15:13 ` Denis
2007-05-24 15:43 99% ` Neil Bothwick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox