* Re: [gentoo-user] Best file system for portage tree?
@ 2012-03-10 15:35 99% ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2012-03-10 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 654 bytes --]
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:30:15 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Any tips on this? Does it make sense to use a special file system just
> for the portage tree? What would be best? Would it help to re-create
> this file system from time to time in case it gets slower with every
> sync?
I use an ext2 filesystem for portage, it's still the fastest out there.
Journals are unnecessary because its such a small filesystem, and if it
does get damaged I can just reformat and sync again.
--
Neil Bothwick
Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but
that's not why we do it. Richard Feynman
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2012-03-10 13:30 [gentoo-user] Best file system for portage tree? Alex Schuster
2012-03-10 15:35 99% ` Neil Bothwick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox