* Re: [gentoo-user] Important package blocked by another important package
@ 2011-08-30 7:59 99% ` Sebastian Beßler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Sebastian Beßler @ 2011-08-30 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 544 bytes --]
Am 30.08.2011 09:15, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
> Personally, I'd put '<=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r99 ~amd64 ~x86' in that
> file. I have the conviction that versions with greater '-r' would be
> better, since it's a revision to the same version.
'~sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88 ~amd64 ~x86' does the same as ~ matches on all
'-r' of a specific version so in this case it matches everything from
sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r1 to sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r999999 (and even above)
Why unmask for two arches ~amd64 and ~x86?
Greetings
Sebastian
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2011-08-30 2:27 [gentoo-user] Important package blocked by another important package meino.cramer
2011-08-30 2:51 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-08-30 3:29 ` meino.cramer
2011-08-30 7:15 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-08-30 7:59 99% ` Sebastian Beßler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox