* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome intrusion?
@ 2016-11-15 19:23 99% ` Jorge Almeida
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Jorge Almeida @ 2016-11-15 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Ian Zimmerman <itz@primate.net> wrote:
> On 2016-11-14 23:52, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
>> Good to know. I'm currently testing openbox without dbus-launch. No
>> problem yet.
>
> Do you _know_ a reason you need dbus, at all?
No.
>
> If you don't, you don't need it ;-)
I would like to believe that.
>
> Typically, a lot of GUI apps have dbus as a soft dependency for the sole
> purpose of avoiding multiple instances. So starting the app for the
> second time just activates (in some general sense) the old window.
Seems harmless enough. But how did they manage to convince nearly
everybody that dbus is the best invention next to sliced bread?
Jorge
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2016-11-14 9:32 [gentoo-user] gnome intrusion? Jorge Almeida
2016-11-14 23:38 ` Andrew Tselischev
2016-11-14 23:52 ` Jorge Almeida
2016-11-15 17:39 ` [gentoo-user] " Ian Zimmerman
2016-11-15 19:23 99% ` Jorge Almeida
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox