* Re: [gentoo-user] ramfs - is it necessary ???
@ 2007-02-23 9:36 99% ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2007-02-23 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 674 bytes --]
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:11:07 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > It does, I have a system that boots 2.6.20 using an initrd. It works
> > fine and I don't feel inclined to get involved in initramfs voodoo
> > just to change an already working system
>
> What is that "voodoo" you're talking about. I did boot my /-on-EVMS
> system with an initrd for years, only to find out that initramfs is so
> much easier to set up. If there's voodoo, it's in initrd.
If I was starting from scratch, I'd use initramfs, but the initrd is
already working and requires zero effort - if it ain't broke...
--
Neil Bothwick
Always be sincere even if you don't mean it.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2007-02-21 22:42 [gentoo-user] ramfs - is it necessary ??? pat
2007-02-22 10:08 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-02-22 18:12 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-02-23 7:11 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2007-02-23 9:36 99% ` Neil Bothwick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox