* Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout --> openrc ?
[not found] ` <20101023100333.221a888d@digimed.co.uk>
@ 2010-10-24 14:30 99% ` Mike Edenfield
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Mike Edenfield @ 2010-10-24 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 10/23/2010 5:03 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:50:26 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>>> You're mixing two different definitions of stable. Portage 2.2 is
>>> certainly reliable, but it is anything but stable with a new version
>>> coming out every day at the moment,.
>
>> I'm waiting for tomorrow when my regularly scheduled portage update
>> hits _rc100.
>
> Well, it hasn't happened yet. A day without a portage update, a rare
> thing these days.
>
> Maybe someone decided that Gentoo is not Debian and 99 release candidates
> should be enough for a bunch of python scripts.
Looks like someone agrees with you:
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/portage-2.2.0_alpha1 [2.2_rc91]
Although, perhaps I'm missing something but doesn't alpha
come *before* release candidate? :)
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2010-10-22 2:02 [gentoo-user] baselayout --> openrc ? James
2010-10-22 20:52 ` Dale
2010-10-22 22:13 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-10-23 0:50 ` Alan McKinnon
[not found] ` <20101023100333.221a888d@digimed.co.uk>
2010-10-24 14:30 99% ` Mike Edenfield
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox