* [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now?
@ 2011-06-24 21:29 99% ` walt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: walt @ 2011-06-24 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 06/23/2011 11:16 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> You'll be telling us there's still a place for Cobol next :-O
Never thought to look before, but:
#eix cobol
* dev-lang/open-cobol
Available versions: (~)1.0 {berkdb nls readline}
Homepage: http://www.opencobol.org/
Description: an open-source COBOL compiler
* dev-lang/tinycobol
Available versions: 0.64 (~)0.65.9
Homepage: http://tiny-cobol.sourceforge.net/
Description: COBOL for linux
I learned something today :)
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2011-06-22 3:55 [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Dale
2011-06-22 6:24 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-06-22 11:18 ` Dale
2011-06-22 13:19 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2011-06-22 13:33 ` Dale
2011-06-22 14:24 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2011-06-22 15:35 ` Dale
2011-06-22 16:11 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2011-06-22 16:58 ` Dale
2011-06-22 17:36 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2011-06-23 17:23 ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " pk
2011-06-23 18:16 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-06-24 21:29 99% ` [gentoo-user] " walt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox