* Re: [gentoo-user] Binary chrome - is it safe in terms of dependencies?
@ 2013-01-31 1:35 99% ` Mike Gilbert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Mike Gilbert @ 2013-01-31 1:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Yohan Pereira <yohan.pereira@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30/01/13 at 11:09pm, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
>> Since Gentoo updates libraries very quickly, I'm wondering if it is
>> safe to use the binary version? Has anyone faced library breakages on
>> this?
>>
>> Chromium is easily recompiled with new libraries and you don't have a
>> broken browser, which won't really be the case with the binary
>> version.
>
> I've used the binary version (google-chrome) for a while and never
> had any breakages. I guess if there's a library update that could
> potentially break google-chrome the gentoo devs would add a blocker so
> you wont be able to install the 2 at the same time.
>
Or I can just bundle a copy of the necessary libraries, similar to
what I have done for libudev.so.0.
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2013-01-30 17:39 [gentoo-user] Binary chrome - is it safe in terms of dependencies? Nilesh Govindrajan
2013-01-30 18:09 ` Yohan Pereira
2013-01-31 1:35 99% ` Mike Gilbert
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox