* [gentoo-user] Re: virtual/shadow
@ 2012-03-12 22:34 99% ` »Q«
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: »Q« @ 2012-03-12 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:29:10 +0200
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone care to offer an opinion on what it will take to get PROVIDES
> support in portage?
IMO, it would take virtuals causing so many headachy breakages that
some devs started keeping up a steady drumbeat on irc and mailing
lists. When the number of virtual packages gets close to a thousand,
I'd guess that might happen. Then there would be years of discussion
and GLEP proposals, and by EAPI 207 it should be done.
;)
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2012-03-12 18:05 [gentoo-user] virtual/shadow Bruce Hill, Jr.
2012-03-12 19:19 ` [gentoo-user] virtual/shadow Nikos Chantziaras
2012-03-12 20:29 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-03-12 22:34 99% ` »Q«
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox