* Re: [gentoo-user] To be updated or not to be updated, Second Part
@ 2013-09-15 13:32 99% ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2013-09-15 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1132 bytes --]
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 08:12:51 +0200, meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote:
> Calculating dependencies... done!
>
> Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB
>
> Nothing to merge; quitting.
>
> ------
>
> beagleboneblack:/root>eix x11-libs/fox
> [D] x11-libs/fox
> Available versions:
> (1.6) *1.6.40 *1.6.45 ~*1.6.49
> (1.7) ~*1.7.40 ~*1.7.41
> {(+)bzip2 debug doc (+)jpeg (+)opengl (+)png profile tiff
> (+)truetype (+)zlib} Installed versions: 1.7.39(1.7)(23:22:36
> 08/07/13)(bzip2 jpeg opengl png truetype zlib -debug -doc -profile
> -tiff) Homepage: http://www.fox-toolkit.org/
> Description: C++ based Toolkit for developing Graphical User
> Interfaces easily and effectively
>
> So, what is about x11-libs/fox? Delete it? Dont delete it?
emerge -cpv x11-libs/fox will ell you if anything depends on it. Chances
are it is a build time dependency of a package, which means portage won't
bother updating it until that package needs updating, unless you use
--with-build-deps=y.
--
Neil Bothwick
There is no such thing as an atheist in a foxhole.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2013-09-14 6:12 [gentoo-user] To be updated or not to be updated, Second Part meino.cramer
2013-09-15 13:32 99% ` Neil Bothwick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox