* Re: [gentoo-user] libssl3.so.12 not found, but why not?
@ 2009-09-17 17:37 99% ` Dirk Heinrichs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Dirk Heinrichs @ 2009-09-17 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 19:21:44 schrieb walt:
> Two days ago after updating world on my ~amd64, at least two apps
> can't find libssl.so.12 even though it's right where it should be.
>
> One difference I find between my working x86 and my broken ~amd64
> is the output of ldconfig -p:
>
> x86 machine:
> #ldconfig -p | grep ssl3.so
> libssl3.so.12 (libc6) => /usr/lib/nss/libssl3.so.12 <== minor number
> libssl3.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/nss/libssl3.so
>
> ~amd64 machine:
> #ldconfig -p | grep ssl3.do
> libssl3.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/nss/libssl3.so
> libssl3.so (libc6) => /opt/flash-libcompat/libssl3.so
>
> Note that the minor number (.12) doesn't show up even though there
> is a correct and proper symlink for it in /usr/lib64/nss.
>
> Another source of confusion for me is that the programs that need
> libssl3.so.12 are both linked against libssl3.so (no minor number)
> but the error message specifically says that libssl3.so.12 can't be
> found.
>
> Can anyone here make sense out of this info?
Not really, but I've seen this on my box at work today. The interesting thing
here was that for the affected program, evolution, libssl3.so showed up four
times in ldd output, where three entries showed "not found" while the forth
showed the location of the lib.
Interestingly, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /usr/lib/nss resolved the issue.
Bye...
Dirk
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2009-09-17 17:21 [gentoo-user] libssl3.so.12 not found, but why not? walt
2009-09-17 17:37 99% ` Dirk Heinrichs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox