* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5
@ 2011-05-25 16:54 99% ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2011-05-25 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:46 on Wednesday 25 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
> For people already running kde it's ok, but for the rest of us
> it's a bit ridiculous, isn't it?
> I used to use a few "k" apps in the 3 days, they were small and
> easily integrated into the system. Now kde is like it's own OS,
> so they've basically eliminated their apps from consideration of
> non-kde users.
>
> Not that it matters much to me, one of the strengths of gentoo
> is how many ways there are to do a given task.
> But there are quite a few kde zealots who seem to be completely
> unaware of what we mean by "fast, light, standalone".
>
> I guess some people didn't experience the 80s or 90s.
>
> :)
It doesn't make sense running koffice without also running KDE, it's a hard
requirement.
And not only did I experience the 80s and 90s, but the 70s as well.
So now that you have defined what fast, light, standalone means by your
current needs, it is obvious that no such package exists and hence there is a
gap in the market.
Now we know what your next project will be.
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
[not found] <gVmch-4xA-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <gWhaz-85z-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
2011-05-25 12:46 ` [gentoo-user] Re: [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5 Indi
2011-05-25 16:54 99% ` Alan McKinnon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox