* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Using an odd number of drives in ZFS RaidZ
@ 2021-07-02 15:13 99% ` J. Roeleveld
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: J. Roeleveld @ 2021-07-02 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Thursday, July 1, 2021 3:47:08 PM CEST Robert David wrote:
> In any of my data arrays I have long time migrated off the RAIDZ to the
> MIRROR or RAID10. You will find finally that the RAIDZ is slow and not
> very flexible. Only think you gain is the extra space in constrained
> array spaces. For RAID10 it is much easier to raise the size, just
> resilvering to new bigger disks, removing old and expanding. The
> resilvering speed is magnitude faster. And anyway much easier to recover
> in cases of failure.
multiple RAIDZ2 vdevs with a fast enough I/O can easily saturate multiple
10Gbit links. I actually have 2 pools in my system, one is using tripple-
mirrored VDEVs, the other 6-disk RAIDZ2 sets.
Both are easily capable of saturating the 10gbit link I use.
--
Joost
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2021-06-29 13:56 [gentoo-user] [OT] Using an odd number of drives in ZFS RaidZ Frank Steinmetzger
2021-07-01 13:47 ` Robert David
2021-07-02 15:13 99% ` J. Roeleveld
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox