* Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response
@ 2007-02-07 20:19 99% ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Hemmann, Volker Armin @ 2007-02-07 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007 12:35 schrieb Benno Schulenberg:
> > Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > > hdparm /dev/hda
> > >
> > > /dev/hda:
> > > multcount = 16 (on)
> > > IO_support = 1 (32-bit)
> > > unmaskirq = 1 (on)
> > > using_dma = 1 (on)
> > > keepsettings = 0 (off)
> > > readonly = 0 (off)
> > > readahead = 256 (on)
> > > geometry = 16383/255/63, sectors = 234493056, start = 0
> >
> > Maybe set readahead to a smaller value? Something like 8 or 16?
> >
> > At least that's what http://linuxgazette.net/issue79/punk.html
> > advises. If you have specific reasons for the higher value, then
> > please elaborate.
it is a default setting I never touched?
Aside from 'IO_support' everything is default.
Oh, and I tried different io-scheds without any success.
>
> I believe there is a misunderstanding here. I am the one with the problem
> not Volker :)
we have both similar problems ;)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2007-02-06 20:29 [gentoo-user] Very bad system response Michael Schreckenbauer
2007-02-07 11:35 ` Benno Schulenberg
2007-02-07 11:51 ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2007-02-07 20:19 99% ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox