* Re: [gentoo-user] ZFS
@ 2013-09-17 7:36 99% ` Marc Stürmer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Marc Stürmer @ 2013-09-17 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Am 17.09.2013 09:20, schrieb Grant:
> Performance doesn't seem to be one of ZFS's strong points. Is it
> considered suitable for a high-performance server?
A high performance server for what?
But you've already given yourself the answer: if high performance is
what you are aiming for it depends on your performance needs and
probably ZFS on Linux is not got to meet those - yet. It is still evolving.
Of course benchmarks are static, real world usage is another cup of coffee.
> Besides performance, are there any drawbacks to ZFS compared to ext4?
Well it only comes as kernel module at the moment. Some people dislike
that.
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2013-09-17 7:20 [gentoo-user] ZFS Grant
2013-09-17 7:36 99% ` Marc Stürmer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox