* Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency?
@ 2007-08-05 16:33 99% ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Bo Ørsted Andresen @ 2007-08-05 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 483 bytes --]
On Sunday 05 August 2007 17:13:46 Tim Allingham wrote:
> > Because --update stops calculating deps when none of the specified
> > targets need updating. Only --deep checks the consistency of all
> > dependencies even when none of the targets need updating. You could argue
> > it's a deficiency in portage (although well-known)..
>
> meaning that an emerge -pvuD world/portage should show the upgrades
Exactly. But it may show a lot more than that.. :p
--
Bo Andresen
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2007-07-16 22:46 [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency? maxim wexler
2007-08-05 14:32 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-08-05 15:13 ` Tim Allingham
2007-08-05 16:33 99% ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox