* Re: [gentoo-user] Why does emerge want to downgrade firefox/xul-runner?
@ 2009-08-25 21:19 99% ` Paul Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Paul Hartman @ 2009-08-25 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Grant Edwards<grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> wrote:
> Were firefox 3.5.2 and xulrunner 1.9.1.2 marked as stable last
> week and then changed back to unstable this week?
I think so, yes. If you read the Changelog file, it shows this:
21 Aug 2009; Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org>
mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1.ebuild:
revert all stable keywords
20 Aug 2009; Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>
mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1.ebuild:
Stable for HPPA (bug #280393).
20 Aug 2009; Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org>
mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1.ebuild:
stable x86, security bug 280393
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2009-08-25 21:04 [gentoo-user] Why does emerge want to downgrade firefox/xul-runner? Grant Edwards
2009-08-25 21:19 99% ` Paul Hartman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox