* Re: [gentoo-user] Important package blocked by another important package
@ 2011-08-30 8:54 99% ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2011-08-30 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 532 bytes --]
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:41:48 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> Or, to be more precise, I have a common package.accept_keywords for
> all my Gentoo systems, some of them x86 and others amd64, so it's a
> habit of mine to unmask both :)
It's just as easy to unmask neither. If an entry in package.unmask does
not specify an arch, portage automatically using the testing version of
whatever is in make.conf.
PS, please don't top post.
--
Neil Bothwick
WITLAG: The delay between delivery and comprehension of a joke.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2011-08-30 2:27 [gentoo-user] Important package blocked by another important package meino.cramer
2011-08-30 2:51 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-08-30 3:29 ` meino.cramer
2011-08-30 7:15 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-08-30 7:59 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-08-30 8:41 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-08-30 8:54 99% ` Neil Bothwick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox