* [gentoo-user] Technical imap mail question
@ 2015-10-15 17:04 99% walt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: walt @ 2015-10-15 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
My ISP recently started offering imap email service in addition to
the pop3/smtp servers they've always had, so I decided to try it.
I was surprised to see that they recommend using a different smtp
server name when setting up my mail client, and they even offer the
option of using port 587 instead of 465 if I prefer it.
Why would I use a different smtp server if I'm now using imap? I use
smtp to send mail, and imap to read it, right? Why not use the same
smtp server in either case?
(The different server names actually resolve to the same IP address, so
the distinction seems to be more theoretical than real, but the theory
is what puzzles me.)
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2015-10-15 17:04 99% [gentoo-user] Technical imap mail question walt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox