* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse
[not found] ` <i4KGf-s4-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
@ 2011-12-05 20:14 99% ` Indi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Indi @ 2011-12-05 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, LinuxIsOne <linuxisone@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware.
> >
> > What does low-spec hardware mean?
>
> Whatever the default setup of the latest release of Ubuntu runs
> sluggish on. (Or what a previous version of Ubuntu ran on, but current
> versions won't)
>
> While somewhat flippant, that seems a pretty reasonable way to think about it.
>
Seems to me Ubuntu is sluggish no matter what hardware you have.
Peopple pay such a high price to avoid learning anything...
But I was thinking more about anything x86 or ppc and single core,
or stuff like intel atom. Anything ARM. Anything pre core2duo from
intel, for sure, as well as any ppc Mac.
--
caveat utilitor
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
[not found] <i4JK9-7dj-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <i4JK9-7dj-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <i4JK9-7dj-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <i4JK9-7dj-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <i4JK9-7dj-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <i4JK9-7dj-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <i4JK9-7dj-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <i4KmR-8n2-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <i4KGf-s4-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
2011-12-05 20:14 99% ` [gentoo-user] Re: can one tell me: gentoo vs opensuse Indi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox