From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-181213-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B64B0139083
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 16:42:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B35EE0ED5;
Fri, 8 Dec 2017 16:42:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22b.google.com (mail-wr0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22b])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA650E084A
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 16:42:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id z18so11366224wrb.8
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 08:42:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=IBAS/HjEkjQEIkT4tcvxscSPW1qZwX1rPeoi0SwN1wE=;
b=P/gD99m8KdKbYp9/zsOhX0ATe+kUIOGNvULKtMqtZiNDsUUkDsN8RcKDH8WPw8jc7Z
HH/E2W37Tqh8hX0gZl8kjH6Dj1xBC8nBEJPwjRPswz6E7Y4GaC9G/EJotxG1XknbR3wi
XeXft8TsIKeaFzQxy+LoFmBBYwfLmPdOsJ0DkCPez6HxsFhcaJe/vDfQx8ExVwMs0PDJ
fk+Ty18T7r8MK4KMi4bWu7zzUsJNM+v4PA9XynRXD+PRxvri5yQXvLkK3QxUmKlYfxpu
dTxyghG57SOCnmQ3GdJBaGlHrtuH893DwBI7QAPT9ILipvL6SYoxUzpoOzLg+91za2KG
sAuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=IBAS/HjEkjQEIkT4tcvxscSPW1qZwX1rPeoi0SwN1wE=;
b=fY3//mgQR/C3czXM2VniJiXsYtmv8YAEWHGNx6SDJFnHS4hvbCmtD8Imvtax06h8Pq
0fNslq9DGMZ4eNu1Hv8IWq1xwKsHfqtGp6vknRyTEhXjtoJzIBUFh45XZEelHvOvVFcJ
ZYHTF/tIGHptXWEEtkd8l8slMQSfcoMm6icbwk6nJZDtrlFpuEWKrdHmEZdDZGeqaWaS
OXEs9NPZafW1RBAlrA5Qm3m418vSnIb54EObo5n+ozPSyXNvd12EW3iSpYveZgOGNIXa
u2njpAgSD4cUAPntKBjDUEeRaoo/6SjuFm4FHg7fugs36yfxXRUvWgXY2rbmKdIe9bPo
WaBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6enSrcwQdaHpuweO0vnWBveknJNwlV3V6OzQ9Bl1yOiFXiGPiP
oxoQfg/GdWvzt1ISez7RjpNMlBoZ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbvsoNAeqyXRf2ePQWA5GsEXFP8Z87cOyF1B1QivWDg39uIJ2iACE+qs1iiGL0w5/MvEfVAMA==
X-Received: by 10.223.187.7 with SMTP id r7mr26640532wrg.253.1512751364079;
Fri, 08 Dec 2017 08:42:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.20.0.40] ([197.101.48.133])
by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s195sm2106044wmb.33.2017.12.08.08.42.42
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Fri, 08 Dec 2017 08:42:43 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] net-wireless/blueman-2.1_alpha2 blocked by
net-wireless/gnome-bluetooth - is it necessary?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <0951308c-02e4-b5f1-24a4-cc83fd6d90d6@ya.ru>
<2626282.TuXHzJEg2m@note> <c23b3e74-6120-1cc9-b282-4abad93a3ba6@ya.ru>
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9ca93a20-ef3d-e9d3-b805-8f8ca9343ac0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 18:37:13 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.5.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c23b3e74-6120-1cc9-b282-4abad93a3ba6@ya.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 4050fbcf-a6cd-42ba-9898-bb498cf0bee9
X-Archives-Hash: e328e17ee486f199c32dc0897e7a3fb0
On 08/12/2017 15:22, Alexey Eschenko wrote:
> It can be the issue. But older version (2.0.4) which is currently
> installed works fine and has no conflicts.
>
> It's quite strange.
>
>
> On 12/08/2017 03:39 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
>>> Is it really necessary to block one package when another installed?
>> Most of the time, the reason to make packages to block each other is
>> collisions (if they they contain files (like binaries or libraries)
>> with same
>> install paths).
>>
>> Although, I can't guarantee that it was the case here.
>>
>> I've noticed that Gnome Team makes some decisions, that doesn't looks
>> logical
>> for a few times already.
>>
>
It's not at all strange; it's quite ordinary actually.
Keeping in mind that I do not use these packages, or gnome, look at the
available blueman packages:
# eix net-wireless/blueman
* net-wireless/blueman
Available versions: (~)2.0.3 (~)2.0.4 [M](~)2.1_alpha1 **9999
{appindicator network nls policykit pulseaudio thunar
PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5 python3_6"
PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5 python3_6"}
2.1 is still in an alpha state, and it is p.masked:
/var/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> (26 Jan 2017)
# Pre-release, masked for testing. Major changes since 2.0.4,
# including dropped support for BlueZ 4.
It is not unreasonable to conclude that blueman-2.1 intends to add
features that conflict with gnome-bluetooth and they can't co-exist. As
Vadim said, file collisions are often the underlying cause.
You unmasked an alpha package, clearly tagged as "for testing". Nothing
add abut the result you got at all.
--
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com