From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
id 1Eyf5B-00085o-SA
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:52:22 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0H0nw17028097;
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:49:58 GMT
Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.195])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0H0l4Es023510
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:47:05 GMT
Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c2so608566ugf
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:47:04 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=KvBxbWntLCLT+af5w92o4skvb7fJjzTpBOMZJObS5RR/wZRPOhbrfkXFSag5ZYZJqQ8pSyLHs6U2ljmxkoNHRwelQXyaySZnzvdLC3826Mv5rCWApnVt/RIslm89PtcZ6Qdv9eTs10RE0uEdFa6lOFl3j8xX9d26aWqFoc8ziuw=
Received: by 10.49.40.14 with SMTP id s14mr276574nfj;
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:47:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.40.19 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:47:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <9b1675090601161647s441760a2k2695caae4dbb071@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:47:04 -0700
From: Trenton Adams <trenton.d.adams@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] usb1 performance out of usb2 external HD
In-Reply-To: <1137453756.20174.11.camel@orpheus>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1137393538.17254.12.camel@orpheus>
<9b1675090601160946g6b2e4535w610105bfd1ac0cd7@mail.gmail.com>
<1137453756.20174.11.camel@orpheus>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id k0H0l4Es023510
X-Archives-Salt: 8e6853d8-179d-4b90-99fe-162e8ffcbd9b
X-Archives-Hash: 8b999c3bb197a9634458ee18c275433b
On 1/16/06, Iain Buchanan <iaindb@netspace.net.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 10:46 -0700, Trenton Adams wrote:
> > Are you mounting with the "sync" option, or no? Try it with, and
> > without. If you do it without, time what it takes to do the copy, and
> > unmount. unmount will do the actual sync.
>
> hey, that sped it up heaps!
>
> $ sudo mount -t vfat -o uid=iain,gid=users,async /dev/sdd6 /mnt/tmp/
> $ time { cp /usr/portage/distfiles/OOo_2.0.1_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz /mnt/tmp/; sudo umount /mnt/tmp/; }
>
> real 0m11.134s
>
> thats a huge increase (11s instead of 81s!), so how come hdparm still
> reports 9MB/s?
I'm wondering if we should be reporting this to the kernel guys. I
see this on *all* linux systems with kernel 2.6, but I'm not sure
about 2.4. But, I think I'll try enabling some options that Richard
mentioned first.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list