From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-95608-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1M7LXe-0006on-Dq
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 22 May 2009 03:35:30 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1C90E0292;
Fri, 22 May 2009 03:35:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com (yx-out-1718.google.com [74.125.44.152])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68FBE0292
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 22 May 2009 03:35:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 36so4857828yxh.46
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 21 May 2009 20:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=oyDaEmXYIDo2aPQ6A8JmqVA95hRtN0sQdXviLaVqvBw=;
b=m5KoqdK0/6FfltjUubg7gGs2q6hyK2tbEGPEtGx4g5t/Ke1LDIJoz1cCakHds94Wtz
X4Vzhj3kWoGIYkst5N2euAHKbCps6R1mLdCAXcXSbSPzx/SX875318xf26E9CHw301bk
BpVEwDJay5r+4TNdYULMvP5FFvj1CNuvD8iwQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=OBQ3vohTX8A9ISx19ULl+fmYPUZpzvSY+py7CmYa9ewr5W0u0S+5pFvGPQC8IySzFr
xpg+lCgkS6T20AdjJAgAfOsSwaIVg+Wog/V9V0BsXyBAIqGzsZ4MXIF4tQsBsp/NUKbP
HeN/vtGvq3pXW3Du4W5OLsx1jDW1+pkkHQSSU=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.123.12 with SMTP id v12mr6380748anc.21.1242963321008; Thu,
21 May 2009 20:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9acccfe50905212020k2ace76b9l5c9fe33bccd5f7c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9acccfe50905211746s2db29c38vbd3122256c43b116@mail.gmail.com>
<200905220306.42711.volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
<200905220317.15084.wonko@wonkology.org>
<9acccfe50905212020k2ace76b9l5c9fe33bccd5f7c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:35:20 -0700
Message-ID: <9acccfe50905212035o5048f2c4vce3ed60693334390@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r5 with
x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 -- file conflict
From: "Kevin O'Gorman" <kogorman@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 7fd563e5-4ba9-4b4f-b9c0-cd4130ff0bce
X-Archives-Hash: 13a521b8b2e8ddf6dc5a98ecc574b06e
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Alex Schuster <wonko@wonkology.org> wrot=
e:
>> Volker Armin Hemmann writes:
>>
>>> On Freitag 22 Mai 2009, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>>> > x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.552-r2 won't compile due to a file conflict=
,
>>> > but portageq does not see it.
>>
>> Probably because the ati-drivers you already have installed do not have =
this
>> file, either because they are an older version, or they did not create i=
t
>> when compiling against the old x.org.
>>
>>> > Anybody know how to work around this?
>>
>>> yes, remove /usr/lib/opengl/ati/extensions/libglx.so it should be owned
>>> by ati-drivers, if not, some screw up happened.
>>
>> Or use 'FEATURES=3D-collision-protect emerge ati-drivers'. I think I had=
the
>> same collision.
>>
>>> /me wonders why there is still a stone old buggy ebuild/driver in
>>> 'stable'.
>>
>> I was not able to compile newer ati-drivers with tuxonice-sources-2.6.28=
-r3.
>> Or ANY ati-drivers with a newer tuxonice kernel.
>>
>
> I thank you for the expert advice. =A0I'm doing the emerge now, but even
> if it succeeds, I'm worried that the xorg-server will still own this
> file, since portageq seems to see that it does. =A0This seems inherently
> wrong.
>
> Sigh. =A0I'm too far along to flinch now, so if this emerges, I'll
> probably restart X.
>
> Wish me luck.
Hmm. Even with the FEATURES option from the suggestion, I get exactly
the same error message. I cut-and-pasted it, but I wonder if it's
spelled right?
I'm going to try just deleting (well, renaming) the file, hoping that
this will work...
--=20
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD