From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-66934-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1ICGZp-0001Sd-1Q
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:09:01 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6LF7kOr010664;
	Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:07:46 GMT
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6LF3IUU005628
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:03:18 GMT
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c8so252980ana
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=PxXWEmWyawH1b4LfT4jdXVCdP1KZiCMww/Q9R1bJJYylHYH8xEjjbYk5WGWQaMlL/ZROq3wJ9vUlcW0nBm1/xJ4jcgrjXfDkfLuhMvcNxFN4yVBcg3KW65YVmz82soKqjLODbsjfqMVGsKTHKirN5BwbP5upv8jTpwi6vp0+jHI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=nnGrnK855xNifLx1ZeflnuRdY72dWlsskdsxaFSPVyYt5jllWOjqSPqFHZJVFo5xe9L47kLvpmNCA7/jobZl8f+WRkRqdDoCrXPjILKGsWch0e6Dpfn4PJJrxwZ0dRhJKPm00CwICBmBuhbMaN0gAEbTh5ojKJONJXLin6qSSvY=
Received: by 10.100.91.6 with SMTP id o6mr781668anb.1185030197614;
        Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.37.3 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9acccfe50707210803w31368c8v2b430018e7fa1f53@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:03:17 -0700
From: "Kevin O'Gorman" <kogorman@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --depclean question
In-Reply-To: <200707210315.15286.wonko@wonkology.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_135661_27103224.1185030197585"
References: <200707210315.15286.wonko@wonkology.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 70b938d5-e69a-477b-b482-4a7ff284904c
X-Archives-Hash: fce5181be7ddb03bf7dd8b30447711b5

------=_Part_135661_27103224.1185030197585
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 7/20/07, Alex Schuster <wonko@wonkology.org> wrote:
>
> Hi there!
>
> Any idea why emerge --depclean wants to remove
> app-shells/bash-completion-config? It it needed by some installed
> packages:
>
> wonko@knork ~ --> equery depends app-shells/bash-completion-config
> [ Searching for packages depending on app-shells/bash-completion-config...
> ]
> app-editors/vim-7.0.235 (bash-completion?
> app-shells/bash-completion-config)
> app-editors/vim-core-7.0.235 (bash-completion?
> app-shells/bash-completion-config)
> app-misc/figlet-222 (bash-completion? app-shells/bash-completion-config)
> app-portage/genlop-0.30.7 (bash-completion?
> app-shells/bash-completion-config)
> app-portage/udept-0.5.99.0.2.95-r1 (bash-completion?
> app-shells/bash-completion-config)
> dev-util/subversion-1.3.2-r4 (bash-completion?
> app-shells/bash-completion-config)
>
> I have the bash-completion USE flag set, so why does emerge --depclean
> want to remove this package? I also tried dep -a -d
> (from app-portage/udept), it also wants to remove it.
>
> My system is up to date, I did emerge -NuD world and revdep-rebuild.
>
> This is no big problem of course, I am just curious and would like to
> understand what is going on.



I don't know any of the details, but I can report this: my system is also
clean,
has the bash-completion USE flag, and does _not_ have the bash-completion
package installed.  Everything seems to work just fine.

Moreover, I use the "bash themes" from Linux Journal of a year or so ago,
which relies heavily on the "complete" builtin.

So you have to ask yourself what capability are you missing that you want?


++ kevin

-- 
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD

------=_Part_135661_27103224.1185030197585
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 7/20/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Alex Schuster</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:wonko@wonkology.org">wonko@wonkology.org</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi there!<br><br>Any idea why emerge --depclean wants to remove<br>app-shells/bash-completion-config? It it needed by some installed packages:<br><br>wonko@knork ~ --&gt; equery depends app-shells/bash-completion-config<br>
[ Searching for packages depending on app-shells/bash-completion-config... ]<br>app-editors/vim-7.0.235 (bash-completion? app-shells/bash-completion-config)<br>app-editors/vim-core-7.0.235 (bash-completion? app-shells/bash-completion-config)
<br>app-misc/figlet-222 (bash-completion? app-shells/bash-completion-config)<br>app-portage/genlop-0.30.7 (bash-completion? app-shells/bash-completion-config)<br>app-portage/udept-0.5.99.0.2.95-r1 (bash-completion? app-shells/bash-completion-config)
<br>dev-util/subversion-1.3.2-r4 (bash-completion? app-shells/bash-completion-config)<br><br>I have the bash-completion USE flag set, so why does emerge --depclean<br>want to remove this package? I also tried dep -a -d<br>
(from app-portage/udept), it also wants to remove it.<br><br>My system is up to date, I did emerge -NuD world and revdep-rebuild.<br><br>This is no big problem of course, I am just curious and would like to<br>understand what is going on.
</blockquote><div><br><br>I don&#39;t know any of the details, but I can report this: my system is also clean,<br>has the bash-completion USE flag, and does _not_ have the bash-completion <br>package installed.&nbsp; Everything seems to work just fine.
<br><br>Moreover, I use the &quot;bash themes&quot; from Linux Journal of a year or so ago,<br>which relies heavily on the &quot;complete&quot; builtin.<br><br>So you have to ask yourself what capability are you missing that you want?
<br><br><br>++ kevin<br></div></div><br>-- <br>Kevin O&#39;Gorman, PhD<br>

------=_Part_135661_27103224.1185030197585--
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list