From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IA6Ht-00046Y-Ns for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:45:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6FFiIkv025375; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:44:18 GMT Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6FFe6jU020704 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:40:07 GMT Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c8so192515ana for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JII1MjBtqEB9bdYCZH73BfrdnVj3i/MpGfzPQdjZTvVEILiQTl9lYim0WcGHD9mg9qsNhJVDLvY2Nf0p/WLGeuY8Lfy4oUx/gTr7aYjdYM3vjcgefnl3BrlgVJ0CyMj23AztK6bw5JWWx2Y5S+r3jSFzGbfVitql/GuTDcYB+R4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=oPlLMf5qk7G2qp/wI0VRxwmkSpK6uBBbboI/X5gEvS6QWyARJKSIziK+2yizGhBcZBU04rh64rrNgldMFYFDd7Sz+diIU4Y6e93KznS2R8VTp1nqMs//1qZN2aaqTWt+0+Lbjz8eFK58Qr5MpL2fC/PhmRoB+SHvFm1CWQ397FA= Received: by 10.100.105.18 with SMTP id d18mr1880315anc.1184514004648; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.37.3 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9acccfe50707150840t18b7fbfck2db46aaf6b230782@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:40:04 -0700 From: "Kevin O'Gorman" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] depclean pwdb? In-Reply-To: <200707151858.16569.crayon.shin.chan.uk@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_54714_2493691.1184514004611" References: <200707151858.16569.crayon.shin.chan.uk@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 672332ec-5dc5-4ba2-9c41-dadca809834e X-Archives-Hash: 1bf7f2de750936ac426d809286f5826e ------=_Part_54714_2493691.1184514004611 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 7/15/07, Crayon Shin Chan wrote: > > On Sunday 15 July 2007 12:48, Thufir wrote: > > Why does depclean "want" to remove the pwdb package? > > Maybe because it's no longer needed? FWIW I've removed it from two of my > systems with no ill effects - so far. I did the same on my main system. I worried about it, of course, but there have been no problems in the two weeks or so since I did that. Let it go. -- Kevin O'Gorman, PhD ------=_Part_54714_2493691.1184514004611 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 7/15/07, Crayon Shin Chan <crayon.shin.chan.uk@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday 15 July 2007 12:48, Thufir wrote:
> Why does depclean "want" to remove the pwdb package?

Maybe because it's no longer needed? FWIW I've removed it from two of my
systems with no ill effects - so far.

I did the same on my main system.  I worried about it, of course, but there have been no problems in the two weeks or so since I did that.
Let it go.

--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
------=_Part_54714_2493691.1184514004611-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list