From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-51314-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1GP7Le-0004Cn-Bt
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:50:58 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8I0oNYH031103;
	Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:50:23 GMT
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8I0kI9V023824
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:46:18 GMT
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n15so2930995nfc
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=CraVjSBpzhXfTpQYbop9m6+ZCV5mSKiJqKkReneju/hbu8oFTTDGYKk9D617i1/Jo6Jf7vs4i5stguc40gl6DSr+wWJUn/mGku9wp9rYiQQa9p8NityoYRlNAdxHTCYFNEE+fBoR8EEVw5+aJdFcdPAZynwF4m+L1Ijqd1mc7dk=
Received: by 10.49.10.3 with SMTP id n3mr16362635nfi;
        Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.48.212.13 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9acccfe50609171746q2df57eb1x9584e7a41e01ac49@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:46:18 -0700
From: "Kevin O'Gorman" <kogorman@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org, tarpman@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Problems after reemerging xorg-x11
In-Reply-To: <450DD74F.4040905@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200609141847.07033.Dan.Johansson@dmj.nu>
	 <200609151123.09469.bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
	 <9acccfe50609160952x19d14fb6l6765aa801a47a62d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200609171340.44926.bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
	 <9acccfe50609170753w72e43310v4bc86b9d6b83ca26@mail.gmail.com>
	 <450DD74F.4040905@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 24530642-9ade-4a47-aa65-ea2361b74f9f
X-Archives-Hash: e8c962ec3f7a96a2c884403135a10715

On 9/17/06, Ryan Tandy <tarpman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > I was under the impression my video card was too old for the binary driver.
> > It's built into the motherboard but reports as
> >    ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL rev 39
> > does anybody know if the binary would help?
> >
> > ++ kevin
> >
> You want VIDEO_CARDS="mach64".  Be warned that this driver is still
> experimental.

Thanks, Randy.  I've already gotten it working with "r128"; I wonder which is
better (if there's indeed a difference).

Do you know anyplace I could read up on this driver?

++ kevin

-- 
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list