From: "Kevin O'Gorman" <kogorman@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Problems after reemerging xorg-x11
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:23:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9acccfe50609171123h60708bf1u87d064e963a9b0e0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200609171626.40925.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
On 9/17/06, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday 17 September 2006 15:53, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > On 9/17/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@zlin.dk> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 16 September 2006 18:52, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > > > That's good to head. I can't get the ATI module compiled in. I thought
> > > > I was doing the right thing following the howto when I put this in
> > > > /etc/make.conf, but it gets ignored:
> > > > VIDEO_CARDS="vga vesa fbdev ati"
> > > > I get the first three, but not ati.
> > > >
> > > > Can you advise?
> > >
> > > s/ati/radeon/
> > >
> > > VIDEO_CARDS="vga vesa fbdev radeon"
> > >
> > > If you want the binary driver also you should add fglrx to VIDEO_CARDS
> > > too..
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bo Andresen
> >
> > I was under the impression my video card was too old for the binary driver.
> > It's built into the motherboard but reports as
> > ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL rev 39
> > does anybody know if the binary would help?
>
> My Xorg log shows that the radeon driver happily deals with:
> ================================================
> (II) R128: Driver for ATI Rage 128 chipsets:
> ATI Rage 128 Mobility M3 LE (PCI), ATI Rage 128 Mobility M3 LF (AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 Mobility M4 MF (AGP), ATI Rage 128 Mobility M4 ML (AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro GL PA (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro GL PB (PCI/AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro GL PC (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro GL PD (PCI),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro GL PE (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro GL PF (AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PG (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PH (PCI/AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PI (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PJ (PCI/AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PK (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PL (PCI/AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PM (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PN (PCI/AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PO (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PP (PCI),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PQ (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PR (PCI),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PS (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PT (PCI/AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PU (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PV (PCI/AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PW (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro VR PX (PCI/AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 GL RE (PCI), ATI Rage 128 GL RF (AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 RG (AGP), ATI Rage 128 VR RK (PCI),
> ATI Rage 128 VR RL (AGP), ATI Rage 128 4X SE (PCI/AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 4X SF (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 4X SG (PCI/AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 4X SH (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 4X SK (PCI/AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 4X SL (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 4X SM (AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 4X SN (PCI/AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro ULTRA TF (AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro ULTRA TL (AGP), ATI Rage 128 Pro ULTRA TR (AGP),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro ULTRA TS (AGP?), ATI Rage 128 Pro ULTRA TT (AGP?),
> ATI Rage 128 Pro ULTRA TU (AGP?)
> ================================================
>
> Not sure what the proprietary ati driver covers, but their website should
> offer some info.
> --
> Regards,
> Mick
Thanks all. I added "r128" which seemed the closest to what I actually have,
and I'm now back running with everything coming up on reboot. I may fool with
the proprietary driver, but it doesn't matter too much -- my use does not stress
the video performance much. I just want it to work.
++ kevin
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-17 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-14 16:46 [gentoo-user] Problems after reemerging xorg-x11 Dan Johansson
2006-09-15 9:23 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
[not found] ` <9acccfe50609160952x19d14fb6l6765aa801a47a62d@mail.gmail.com>
2006-09-17 11:40 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-09-17 14:53 ` Kevin O'Gorman
2006-09-17 15:26 ` Mick
2006-09-17 18:23 ` Kevin O'Gorman [this message]
2006-09-18 2:30 ` Walter Dnes
2006-09-17 23:16 ` Ryan Tandy
2006-09-18 0:46 ` Kevin O'Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9acccfe50609171123h60708bf1u87d064e963a9b0e0@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kogorman@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox