Re: [gentoo-user] Use and removal of binary packages

["Kevin O'Gorman" <kogorman@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1643 bytes --]

On 6/13/06, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:40:47 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>
> > I may have a need to install one or more binary packages to fix
> > a problem I'm having.  These are ones that have been made for
> > my system during normal emerges, but have since been pruned from
> > the system.
> >
> > My question: how to clean up when I'm done?  A cursory look at
> > the packages makes me think they're plain tar archives with no
> > metadata.  How do I get rid of them when I'm done with them?
>
> There is metadata appended to the end of the file. If you try unpacking
> one, you'll see a warning about extraneous data, this is the metadata.
>
> > Or must I install them using some tool that creates the metadata?
>
> What's wrong with installing with portage? Provided the packages are in
> $PKGDIR, you can install with "emerge --usepkgonly packagename". You can
> then unmerge in the usual way.
>
> If the package is one that prevents you from using portage, unpack it to
> the root of your filesystem, then immediately use the above command to
> emerge it properly.
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> Failure is not an option...it is integrated with every Microsoft product.


Another killer .signature.  Is it optimistic?

Anyway, thanks.  This will do very nicely for me because I'll be using
packages
created by portage.  However, I'm not sure I got what you're talking about
in that
last paragraph.  Unpacking to the root would pollute everything, no?  Then
how
do I get a clean unmerge.  Just for curiosity -- as I said, I don't think I
need it for this.

++ kevin




-- 
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2118 bytes --]