[gentoo-user] Gcc-4.3.3

[gentoo-user] Gcc-4.3.3

[Jerry McBride]

Anyone else noticing problems with the new compiler? 
An example, sysklogd no longer builds with 4.3.3, but did with 4.3.2-r3, etc. 
etc. New (~x86) version of sysklogd fails too....

So far, I'm not able to get the sources cleaned up enough to get it to compile 
cleanly... I'm going back to 4.3.2-r3 until 4.3.3-r1 comes out... :')



-- 

*****************************************************************************
                                       
                             From the desk of:
                             Jerome D. McBride
                                       
   16:41:14 up 45 days, 22:47,  5 users,  load average: 3.41, 2.52, 2.34
 
*****************************************************************************

Re: [gentoo-user] Gcc-4.3.3

[Saphirus Sage]

On Jan 31, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@comcast.net>  
wrote:

>
> Anyone else noticing problems with the new compiler?
> An example, sysklogd no longer builds with 4.3.3, but did with 4.3.2- 
> r3, etc.
> etc. New (~x86) version of sysklogd fails too....
>
> So far, I'm not able to get the sources cleaned up enough to get it  
> to compile
> cleanly... I'm going back to 4.3.2-r3 until 4.3.3-r1 comes out... :')
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> *** 
> *** 
> *** 
> ********************************************************************
>
>                             From the desk of:
>                             Jerome D. McBride
>
>   16:41:14 up 45 days, 22:47,  5 users,  load average: 3.41, 2.52,  
> 2.34
>
> *** 
> *** 
> *** 
> ********************************************************************
>
I couldn't even install gcc4.3.3 on my amd64 machine. The build failed  
each time and I essentially decided to just wait for the next revision. 

[gentoo-user] Re: Gcc-4.3.3

[Nikos Chantziaras]

Saphirus Sage wrote:
> I couldn't even install gcc4.3.3 on my amd64 machine. The build failed 
> each time and I essentially decided to just wait for the next revision.

Working fine here.  glibc-2.9_p20081201-r1 with linux-headers-2.6.28-r1.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gcc-4.3.3

[Jerry McBride]

On Saturday 31 January 2009 05:54:27 pm Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Saphirus Sage wrote:
> > I couldn't even install gcc4.3.3 on my amd64 machine. The build failed
> > each time and I essentially decided to just wait for the next revision.
>
> Working fine here.  glibc-2.9_p20081201-r1 with linux-headers-2.6.28-r1.

On three x86 boxs (32bit), gcc 4.3.3 was not able to compile sysklogd or even 
glibc.

-- 

*****************************************************************************
                                       
                             From the desk of:
                             Jerome D. McBride
                                       
   18:09:59 up 46 days, 16 min,  5 users,  load average: 1.50, 2.08, 2.53
 
*****************************************************************************

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gcc-4.3.3

[Peter Alfredsen]

On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:11:20 -0500
Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@comcast.net> wrote:

> On three x86 boxs (32bit), gcc 4.3.3 was not able to compile sysklogd
> or even glibc.

If you had errors about .la files then try to emerge --sync and
re-emerge it w.r.t. http://bugs.gentoo.org/256636 which was fixed
bumplessly.

/PA