From: Derek Tracy <tracyde@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:32:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9999810b0511161432w38b51b0ob2cb2782ea5f3e1d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200511161551.00800.tradergt@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2122 bytes --]
On 11/16/05, Jeff Smelser <tradergt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 16 November 2005 02:50 pm, Derek Tracy wrote:
>
> > That is what I was thinking when I switched to stable..... From what I
> am
> > seeing either my computer doesn't like stable code or stable does not
> mean
> > stable anymore.
>
> But thats not what you said. I Quote:
>
> "In the past I have always leaned toward ~x86 (I love bleeding edge). But
> since this was going to be a new install I decided to do the preferred
> method
> and set all ~x86 flags via /etc/portage/package.keywords for specific
> packages. "
This means your MIXING the two and is only recommended once the system is
> up.
> During an install, you should do one or the other, not start mixing and
> matching. HOWEVER, if you did set all to x86, and havent touched
> package.keyword, read the next paragraph.
I did not set any of the flags as I wanted to get the system up and running
first. What I was doing was pointing out that if I needed to set the ~x86
flag on any packages then I would do so via the above stated file.
Stable is fine.. I really dont understand how some modules have ANY thing to
> do with being x86 or ~x86.. Modules are always finicky, no matter what
> linux
> distro you use.. You probably are just forgetting to compile in the kernel
> options you had before, that you do not now have. (Guessing of course).
Been there and checked that. Confirmed to not be the case.
Sounds to me you just re-installed before making sure you had all your ducks
> in a row and blaming it on gentoo. I havent seen anything in your message
> that I can say, gentoo did it, and you didnt do it yourself.. It all
> really
> just sounds like configuration issues, that happens on all new install, no
> matter the distro, x86/~x86, or otherwise.
I would have to disagree with you on this. I do not believe that it is a
config issue I beleive that many of the x86 packages still do not play well
with each other, that is what I am saying needs fixed.
Jeff
>
>
>
--
---------------------------------
Derek Tracy
tracyde@gmail.com
---------------------------------
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3185 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-16 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-16 16:20 [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 18:23 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-19 15:07 ` A. Khattri
2005-11-16 19:53 ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-16 20:50 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:50 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 22:32 ` Derek Tracy [this message]
2005-11-17 0:26 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 11:24 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 11:59 ` Nagatoro
2005-11-17 7:44 ` jarmstrong
2005-11-16 22:51 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 3:03 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17 9:23 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 13:52 ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 14:35 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 17:44 ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 15:21 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17 0:17 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-17 0:34 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 20:12 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30 ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:04 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30 ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:47 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 20:55 ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:59 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:10 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 21:20 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 22:31 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 23:24 ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:33 ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-16 21:53 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 20:54 ` Zac Medico
2005-11-16 22:22 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:37 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 0:21 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-17 14:03 ` Bill Roberts
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-16 20:27 Budd, Tracy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9999810b0511161432w38b51b0ob2cb2782ea5f3e1d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tracyde@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox