From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QDmk9-0006dJ-ID for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 00:00:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C1261C003; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 23:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1491C003 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 23:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so1588704bwg.40 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:58:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=/Wszz9Zy4B61ifh8d/eiN47F3stZBhj8qmHYZrmRnJA=; b=dyaHRbJVpjLntSWlEoE3BY9+fy8HJqXoxs3ChEBDXZWc81txOJHmGMNIsnJRWFEPdk CR9/Pic/cwheUXA3my4Po+ezCzg/h1eQs/dw6xaJTvp4J1Fk0/YgXu5cd9sjmUJX76fR yHviCui5BFkrpqhaGMUZCigRi/UUdu8ADkHg0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; b=bwZr38lRG+0qQHy4R8XNVAKpvvmPndBprJtYh3/u8pugmCu6meylo5fvdma6h2Ikfp ap7HnqZDMa9OwIoedIGafKocy3peRFE4bpX1x52K89qnxJTB1cMPU3fQSW1JMsvKaLYK LQxtqQsThyyklob8PRY9rhwS+or6YyW3b5P3E= Received: by 10.204.14.137 with SMTP id g9mr2034961bka.134.1303603096922; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC746A0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.199.70.160]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y22sm2470153bku.20.2011.04.23.16.58.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:58:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Building pygtk-2.22.0-r1 fails. Help, please! Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 01:58:10 +0200 Message-Id: <9880844.oCiNLeZFty@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.6 beta5 (Linux/2.6.36.4r4; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <201104232221.28990.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> References: <20110422180508.GA17715@acm.acm> <20110423163544.GA18788@acm.acm> <201104232221.28990.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 9bbc8d7f54b595ef8288dc16c3fd7ae1 On Saturday 23 April 2011 22:21:28 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 18:35 on Saturday 23 April 2011, Alan > > Mackenzie did opine thusly: > > OK. I managed to get the problem fixed, basically by trying everything, > > > > though I don't really understand what I did. This was my recipe: > > emerge --sync > > emerge --update --deep --newuse xfce4-meta > > > > , which updated libglade-2.6.4 and pygtk-2.22.0-r1 successfully. So > > thanks! > > In that case, you either had an incomplete portage tree and syncing gave you > all the bits you needed. Or the pygtk ebuild was faulty and the dev fixed > it without bumping the version number. which happens everytime a version is so bugged it does not install.