From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6E9158041 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25F21E2AD9; Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aya.dale.ro (dale.ro [81.196.105.36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55359E2ACF for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aya.dale.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B1F18B8825 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 00:32:24 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dale.ro Received: from aya.dale.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ruja.dale.ro [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HP46ompGJht for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 00:32:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [192.168.23.9] (m.dale.ro [82.78.3.65]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by aya.dale.ro (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9BDE18900E8 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 00:32:21 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <96d21300-eec0-4ac3-9ec3-87fed9771219@dale.ro> Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 00:32:21 +0300 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: silencing distcc with systemd To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <3fe654a8-74eb-4ba3-a7c3-acf4f81f2060@gmail.com> <5f98ae41-12d9-42a0-9223-24be094da4db@gmail.com> <2dff4ca9-176c-42ba-9c04-c7dabf508cb0@dale.ro> <750104cb-d17e-4a1a-b4f9-65150a9430fc@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: "Alexandru N. Barloiu" In-Reply-To: <750104cb-d17e-4a1a-b4f9-65150a9430fc@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e7e8e689-9a44-4644-a9b1-6b24675e5567 X-Archives-Hash: c758b63322f47bbd581b40b12e2656db I think in the past, the service file had a -v. Somewhere near the present, they reverted to a non -v service file. So if you keep upgrading distcc, prolly the service file still has a -v from past installations. If you uninstall it, and install it again, then prolly you got the new service file which is without -v. That prolly explains why some machines still have it, and some don't. On 4/1/2024 12:03 AM, Daniel Frey wrote: > On 3/31/24 13:59, Alexandru N. Barloiu wrote: >> think the distcc.service file has an extra -v (--verbose). if you >> remove that, it will behave as expected. >> > > I checked all the units on one of the machines still showing the > problem and an extra '-v' is not present in any of the files. > > That's a good thought though. I wouldn't have even thought about that > when I was looking at the unit files initially. > > Dan >