From: Stroller <stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Handbrake: Is it is or is it ain't in portage
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 02:45:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9363C3DB-A0B7-420A-9DA3-AAE8538F5FDE@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=rgXo_UQFqbjc5HxPuxyKWEuDYUg_cTyCNkEBk@mail.gmail.com>
On 16 Aug 2010, at 01:43, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> There's a program I really want to use, and I was hoping it existed
> in Gentoo.
> It's called handbrake. eix can't find it. equery cannot find it.
> But there's
> a bug (#89432) filed against it, with the last comment (#111) just 4
> days ago.
>
> So where in the portage is handbrake-0.9.4.ebuild?
To expand on Dale's answer, Handbrake is unlikely ever to be in Portage.
The Handbrake developers use the poor practice of snapshotting the
upstream libraries they depend upon (I'm not sure if they also patch
or modify them, instead of pushing those changes upstream) and then
packaging those libs with Handbrake (in a particularly ugly way, too,
one might add).
So when you install Handbrake you download a bunch of additional
libraries (which you likely already have installed on your system) and
it is compiled against those versions.
The correct way to do this would be for the handbrake developers to
simply specify which libraries are required and link against the ones
already installed on your system. If a specific version of a library
is required - but generally speaking it shouldn't be - then that can
be done as part of the ebuild / makefile dependency checking.
The link you posted to handbrake-0.9.4.ebuild is an ebuild. You can
install it something like this:
# mkdir -p /usr/local/portage/media-video/handbrake/
# curl http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=229397 > \
/usr/local/portage/media-video/handbrake/handbrake-0.9.4.ebuild
# ebuild manifest /usr/local/portage/media-video/handbrake/
handbrake-0.9.4.ebuild
# emerge handbrake
It's a shitty ebuild, and it has to be, because that's inherent in the
way the Handbrake devs "package" their program, but the ebuild does
install and work the way the Handbrake devs intended.
I would have thought you'd already know this if you had fully read bug
#89432.
I know that transcoding is a bit of a black art, but I'm not convinced
Handbrake is actually that good.
Stroller.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-16 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-16 0:43 [gentoo-user] Handbrake: Is it is or is it ain't in portage Kevin O'Gorman
2010-08-16 0:55 ` Dale
2010-08-16 1:45 ` Stroller [this message]
2010-08-16 2:22 ` Dale
2010-08-16 3:02 ` Kevin O'Gorman
2010-08-16 4:49 ` Indexer
2010-08-16 20:00 ` Kevin O'Gorman
2010-08-16 7:35 ` Stroller
2010-08-16 19:52 ` Kevin O'Gorman
2010-08-17 0:59 ` Stroller
2010-08-16 15:13 ` Bill Longman
2010-08-16 20:21 ` Paul Hartman
2010-08-17 14:08 ` Kevin O'Gorman
2010-08-17 14:35 ` Stroller
2010-08-17 16:06 ` Paul Hartman
2010-08-17 18:18 ` Kevin O'Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9363C3DB-A0B7-420A-9DA3-AAE8538F5FDE@stellar.eclipse.co.uk \
--to=stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox