From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7fAI-0006pH-Ac for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:14:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7NKCCmZ030926; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:12:12 GMT Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.194]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7NK7Fvv011368 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:07:16 GMT Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id b2so246780nfe for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:08:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T0rnhk6kXVCgc9BrqPjKUEsf9nrK0GG9uVrXnpR7IWw58+kMRQW7ajkvWxv+5EjomGoOkf+j52U1V8QcUQ4d4c91UOdx5IyvreD3htZMA7u754T+LmWRhHS4ExrUjcREwCbW7XKo45au+KENMJESMwVmO3p3ioBXTaDRZDgKmiY= Received: by 10.48.43.14 with SMTP id q14mr160128nfq; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.249.17 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <92e835f905082313087cf2c4d7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:08:10 +0200 From: Matthias Krebs To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] More splash problems In-Reply-To: <430B7596.1060009@planet.nl> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline References: <430ADD7B.5040208@gmail.com> <430B39BF.8070803@planet.nl> <430B61F5.6080501@gmail.com> <92e835f9050823115074bab4fa@mail.gmail.com> <430B7596.1060009@planet.nl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j7NK7Fvv011368 X-Archives-Salt: 594ec6e0-f67c-4ba1-a027-a20028b43f86 X-Archives-Hash: 1d42b622b11d08b8bac1fc4a27108b1c On 8/23/05, Holly Bostick wrote: > Matthias Krebs schreef: > > And as > > someone else mentioned before, vesafb-tng is not a valid kernel > > parameter, so everything after it is ignored. > > In what world is this? If you're using vesafb-tng (added to the kernel > options by the fbsplash patch which you get with the gentoo kernels, > which is no surprise, given that it was created by spock, a gentoo > developer), then it most certainly is a valid kernel parameter (and was > selected in the kernel config output that was posted in a previous message. > To quote the author of vesafb-tng: "The driver name used in the video= kernel command line section is still vesafb, and not vesafb-tng. Thus, video=vesafb-tng:1024x768-32@85 is invalid, video=vesafb:1024x768-32@86 being the proper form" See his website at http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/vesafb-tng/ Cheers, Matze -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list