From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mne7j-0001nR-0J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:55:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B296E0724; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.244]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C66BE0724 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d40so10274259and.1 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:55:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=n+m71d+opu+7sc3VivJvzOnE22fQq55HbFAQ4kIwHRE=; b=qFWjcNOwRMHN3lkcIVM0s+l7NDkXMMc63pxncBwbRE4wSd8jcpJMWLYObUnwHqeF+v S1vp2xsgJ+/GXivIbyPnh7w0EmsGVghv5Hln+NY4O/F6axILgqjWiDAofizmkIJ+mpu4 kfIFjVAaY8p1CoGcNA/v7iuCOoDv9vvf4M29A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=xVAj7fM3OPK5CwEZgAD0znyZVoBzyEqWmz4lBwvSDvceu+EV2ohS5HbcvA10GjZCbp fn2xtiGlNMPN85VG6eezvF84wiTzLeUUSTliM7QlcrmpAqVXZvsGgV8BhZRc3O5L1+oJ Z+ID29kUulQ4F840H3d3bOIiC8zbA79VH3/X8= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.6.38 with SMTP id j38mr8049937ani.138.1253044533119; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:55:33 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cr=C3=ADstian_Viana?= Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:55:18 -0300 Message-ID: <92ad22480909151255t54700471k308f611a5298d193@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [gentoo-user] comments on portage.keywords To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c9256448cdc10473a32ab4 X-Archives-Salt: 5580d5aa-d236-4d80-a94c-70e08baa6ae5 X-Archives-Hash: 1b1044d343478a2a02ce97dda89ffc51 --001636c9256448cdc10473a32ab4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi, I have a Gentoo amd64 and I noticed portage doesn't ignore comments totally on the file /etc/portage/package.keywords (don't know about the other portage config files). if I have the following line on portage.keywords: www-client/mozilla-firefox portage unmasks the Firefox ebuild for my architecture. but if I have: www-client/mozilla-firefox # hello world portage doesn't unmask this ebuild. if I want to put a comment at the end o= f a line in this file [and I want that line to work], I have to explicitly ad= d the architecture flag: www-client/mozilla-firefox ~amd64 # hello world I don't think this behavior is consistent, comments shouldn't matter. is that a desirable feature or a bug? see ya, --=20 Cr=C3=ADstian Deives dos Santos Viana [aka CD1] Sent from Campinas, SP, Brazil --001636c9256448cdc10473a32ab4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi,

I have a Gentoo amd64 and I noticed portage doesn't ignore c= omments totally on the file /etc/portage/package.keywords (don't know a= bout the other portage config files). if I have the following line on porta= ge.keywords:

www-client/mozilla-firefox

portage unmasks the Firefox ebuild fo= r my architecture. but if I have:

www-client/mozilla-firefox # hello= world

portage doesn't unmask this ebuild. if I want to put a co= mment at the end of a line in this file [and I want that line to work], I h= ave to explicitly add the architecture flag:

www-client/mozilla-firefox ~amd64 # hello world

I don't thin= k this behavior is consistent, comments shouldn't matter. is that a des= irable feature or a bug?

see ya,

--
Cr=C3= =ADstian Deives dos Santos Viana [aka CD1]
Sent from Campinas, SP, Brazil --001636c9256448cdc10473a32ab4--