From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HkKdL-0002lZ-IF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 13:49:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l45DlDif026336; Sat, 5 May 2007 13:47:13 GMT Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l45De1t8013709 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 13:40:01 GMT Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so1869222wxd for ; Sat, 05 May 2007 06:40:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=UhAxV4MyR9RDXZwJeWUSjFS4paoIajzMkdv4+y6H6IPPXX9RGcXKPRJsWa+TGNC1Opb8SKC+jXdFJS9kAcbxVUt2fnJO0TrRSXzDgeT/Jz3mawQGlKJ9lzmKfaL7v6oh34dkKF/mOfFbN3SSG5xpQCNFZuj6MIyKVKj1ZV9fFww= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=jE2Exxg6cVhR4wwij6WBQXvYaGK6XpvuWgUocnCjyYPXMqp/OeGT3KCPB6l0B47baC5SpIwuMdMv9fGvTn/q+LFc6O6LunuZfaF8ocA9M8n3TtwCioXeodfkfc0w9Z3a7DJaPhQ5dnOP2Pm/pYtmtQxz9vEuETp3JSZhVXTxkQA= Received: by 10.70.65.8 with SMTP id n8mr8000267wxa.1178372400767; Sat, 05 May 2007 06:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.98.16 with HTTP; Sat, 5 May 2007 06:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9238e8de0705050640o3de68d0ub4bd8184d05b9a74@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 15:40:00 +0200 From: "=?UTF-8?Q?Marko_Koci=C4=87?=" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Wesnoth version Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Archives-Salt: cfe69e85-1c05-4520-8a7e-369058db7fea X-Archives-Hash: 38fd41b5edc6393b4b122984c29d52cf Is there a specific reason why gentoo doesn't provide development versions of Battle for Wesnoth (games-strategy/wesnoth)? I couldn't find anything in bug database. Development versions (1.3.2) are pretty stable, so I can't see a reason why are not included in "~x86". As for "x86", 1.2.4 (latest stable) seems ok. Should I open a bug for that? Thanks, Marko -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list