From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QWU1P-0001AX-1a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:51:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FF6B1C123; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.167]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E5B1C123 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.152] (helo=smtp20.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWTzI-0007Ql-5f for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:49:00 +0200 Received: from 5353c717.cm-6-4d.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([83.83.199.23] helo=data.antarean.org) by smtp20.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWTzF-0001YO-Hy for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:48:57 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C702952 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:53:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at antarean.org Received: from data.antarean.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (data.antarean.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ng7uCSLdUYHP for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:53:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eve.localnet (eve.lan.antarean.org [10.20.13.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33F1C1F99 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:53:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Joost Roeleveld To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Internet Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:48:56 +0200 Message-ID: <9215654.RUBKbpEk2G@eve> User-Agent: KMail/4.6 beta5 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4DF762E6.3050306@club-internet.fr> References: <4DF762E6.3050306@club-internet.fr> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1QWTzF-0001YO-Hy X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=-0.928, vereist 5, BAYES_00 -1.90, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.98, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.01) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: joost@antarean.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: bb2a31483ca12a0425e0bb3a7a091a24 On Tuesday 14 June 2011 15:32:22 Cahn Roger wrote: > Hi, > > But the problem is on my desktop with two HD, > one with XP and the other with Gentoo amd64. > None of them can connect to internet neither gentoo nor XP. > I tryed many things (revdep-rebuild, verification in the box, etc.) > but I was unsuccessful. Here is what I become at boot: > > And another try: > > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 start > * Caching service dependencies ... > [ ok ] > * Bringing up interface eth0 > * dhcp ... > * Running dhcpcd ... > dhcpcd[6723]: version 5.2.12 starting > dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: broadcasting for a lease > dhcpcd[6723]: timed out > dhcpcd[6723]: allowing 8 seconds for IPv4LL timeout > dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: probing for an IPv4LL address > dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: checking for 169.254.79.43 > dhcpcd[6723]: eth0: using IPv4LL address 169.254.79.43 > dhcpcd[6723]: forked to background, child pid 6744 > [ ok ] > * received address 169.254.79.43/16 > > Could please anybody tell me how to solve this awkward problem? > Thank you very much > Roger Hi Roger, The log you showed indicates that the PC is unable to reach the DHCP server. As the issue occurs with both Operating Systems on the same machine makes me think there is an issue with the network-connection. Can you check the network cable and connections to ensure that is actually correct? -- Joost