From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6A651396D9 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 19:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC4F32BC02B; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 19:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pg0-x244.google.com (mail-pg0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60EAF2BC020 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 19:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg0-x244.google.com with SMTP id g6so532110pgn.6 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:38:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WPNyeuz1mF4/e7lam9vqf9jJAP4pFmigJYt6KlxLjlM=; b=FY8sYRbM4jYVYvQYXvUp9w1DUWZB/2bLkVaDOTW/7Ap3iRR3KWRcHfd1fMZUlIx41V nf+OlM1p0bNshAwPKWmPfdXxXUTZBMUolFFv+c7wGAfZdp4oJisdx7fG8dIwDB69YwOI E/sXE6tEpsISxknsmCCs3BcFZj/AEqivvWbVoeBfTrdLo2rsvdXMm8aHR5sHbTk4CH8V tN9uaQXibMrPrAWnnUv7GLoZWimlRKc+TjfabTbze9+QOdHy287Skwyj4VQqmNl27XCJ /TCWq9Va1EBEQLrUE6XQMiS6eb03Vb1U34Mona6FtSvtBfbH2k4/KZNHQ/KCSYwDiiTc 066g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WPNyeuz1mF4/e7lam9vqf9jJAP4pFmigJYt6KlxLjlM=; b=o5ptAlZzP8OdjJE9tyi15iu9Fh4qFo8wpymL3pm6wX+bl6ynGfIh+gKfhnMmwn2UoE GUNGHJslZiZaGe+IcT8zUEaCAQ8qzoWLucdGqUT+r9Ig1W/PcSAmA04hlmFvux3IHSWq UxiOcisrqdQDmTOwDPDtncB5M7IgwaKNoJeQARTRqJN0GGlw1HrH2HXQPby7RA7ocX3y wQ6jjXUySBklriUIN5rnOKL4/j/9TBa35XdQ9U7WixIzw2kDoqUD0RLpSMQgpHhfv2ZP 0whdkxxinkam4Awd60ybAvTw5XPVh7OoGAkhOpsdAueib1MVUmHgWfDrXzsOdrsyz9Gx GKzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVZ3wMY8B2BuOdRklsNJUNRVvhsOj80Q4y9CsY82d+yAPJz6JA4 7kC2XAQBaSC+zATQtIe5yNDxskXQ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBtkKLGpHMkZUA/u7dELiT+ytJdhw9RbatlgJf46leEXkAj9H3Va0wTJ4mdp9oc6ht25b7jbg== X-Received: by 10.99.178.77 with SMTP id t13mr2164067pgo.219.1507923509125; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:569:7cc5:7100:222:4dff:fe48:22cc? (node-1w7jr9qty9x0gwcctadyzjpho.ipv6.telus.net. [2001:569:7cc5:7100:222:4dff:fe48:22cc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k24sm4055274pfj.151.2017.10.13.12.38.28 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Why I can't I build systemd without ipv6? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <14d2d8af-e7b9-d5e6-06c1-a7f3ad01ac23@gmail.com> From: Daniel Frey Message-ID: <8f55eaa1-5ff6-c224-6d6a-6ab32e4cbcb9@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:38:23 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: afbc5a5b-1cbc-4137-9d0c-c2899592414b X-Archives-Hash: 7d43b072230c9f8c1ff3e10ac63eacc0 On 10/13/2017 10:50 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2017-10-13, Daniel Frey wrote: > > >> And is there a way to build systemd without ipv6? Or am I going to have >> to revert these three systems back to openrc? > ^^^^^^ > > You misspelled "upgrade". > > ;) > That depends. One one of the three machines, I reported a bug about mdmon terminating too early in the shutdown process causing mdadm to mark my IMSM raid as dirty. I had a workaround posted, but some time back it stopped working, so I tried systemd and haven't had that problem since. I really don't want to mess around with that again, having a resync'ing RAID on every reboot is tiresome and it thrashes the disks for no good reason. Not to mention it makes the system so slow for a few hours you can't even use it. The other two I could switch, I think, without to much issues if it came down to it. Dan