From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 185341396D9 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 21:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29B0E2BC043; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 21:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pf0-x244.google.com (mail-pf0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA01CE0DA4 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 21:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id x7so11397397pfa.1 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:55:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z/BpA/wqGrvblfyqKkzbBS0GOh0e9IwLTWwrRuxLPT4=; b=l/LheXFdw6wn5LL6tiBqTsdw9WXvhlbCT21UDvhjE6mZkMvYZtJKIlMpJbEnR4GKSe I9dd0j25/QwfUVHn4Bv7GKqG18Xhz6IPNDPYkj+6VJWDRvQuORW+/DFeoCNp4jBkiQOQ 9T2fCdj2+7n/KK5L8ZXjrlN7GxlAUf0EOTb5Adp3f0qoZYHQykKXWwrz+OYu/vQJGDAS 35f7LkD9juUaIMD5cCRXWTK7rZLfiB2a/ZhAZQqB8MWsT+A347Kt2vd6M6/i5kJt2g0l SE39vfdPFU6QJBiz4v/SaeOXMqR8Y23nMPeKMR6dPrWH4pcBUIRrLoFsd0LZKUypGmy+ CQug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=z/BpA/wqGrvblfyqKkzbBS0GOh0e9IwLTWwrRuxLPT4=; b=teB4RDe/lY/aPG/D3KiBPftXDYXdfF/RQO3MIq4bTZpzXqVsy1cqXh2ib8D5lhLFqr xCjgIikHB83GbKffiNZXHm67gX/LrLnwSAtMXld1ZyGjyFpUX5h+QmVcba9aVdKI46kR ZDfXManvX1UuCs2onJytqBjKLguaQu/JK9xZU/CeRNyIjeqhjYNYDC0ON3RI2MASs/z8 az04dEOdiZwxYAHPh+c/plv92itQ9ixAhHrUt/0c3w1AT3xvlzcdhxgWLyaPLncoLVoU zDiEAkAAxcx10sc5sVNY4ZCyoIFXRMpn2Judzcmjx/f+Ds79y07bikZDTk+7tDmvwdjv JwtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaW02v3oNCeVOSTbA1QgjrwSDSHQc+PsBCp3AA06VZkAxwfNxnhY 1GynRfvqOm1gQ5qzEds5TKLCmn0E X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBMkjFsyslPvyx6XGCfHzuZa+DfgeluC2kXK9bzs8VOgAAdbQiiA76k21lT+REtgfsCGgoqsg== X-Received: by 10.99.123.78 with SMTP id k14mr2361143pgn.351.1507931751129; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:569:7cc5:7100:222:4dff:fe48:22cc? (node-1w7jr9qty9x0gwcctadyzjpho.ipv6.telus.net. [2001:569:7cc5:7100:222:4dff:fe48:22cc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z89sm4243073pff.21.2017.10.13.14.55.50 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Why I can't I build systemd without ipv6? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <14d2d8af-e7b9-d5e6-06c1-a7f3ad01ac23@gmail.com> <2374693.n4jBRkxzkn@note> From: Daniel Frey Message-ID: <8dbaf54c-fa49-5713-66ee-1cba89439cfd@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:55:50 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f67dc4a0-3b5c-4410-a3fd-b6e9f49e0636 X-Archives-Hash: 2e543e43f4b8307bca453f323017a339 On 10/13/2017 02:48 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2017-10-13, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > >> Well, actually, you was alread adviced about some working methods of >> solving your issue (both right and wrong ones, but it is anyway your >> decision to take ones to use), so I'll just clarify the simple >> thing: >> >> You can suffer on such problems in relation to IPv6 **ONLY** in the >> case when your ISP **DO** have IPv6 support (say, announce IPv6 >> preffix to you via SLAAC or DHCPv6), but having **BROKEN** IPv6 >> routing. > > It might not be the ISP that's broken. It might be the user's > firewall/router. A lot of the cheap consumer models are starting to > "support" IPv6 by default when it appears to them that the ISP > supports IPv6. But, the default IPv6 firewall/router settings aren't > always usable. > I'm currently using the ISP provided router, as I don't have anything ATM that can handle 150 mbps symmetrical. Dan