From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HyAEN-0001LP-8s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:32:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5CHV9YB009444; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:31:09 GMT Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5CHQVsl004036 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:26:32 GMT Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so747517pyb for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:26:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=A234Gfb/iNxfmz7HsXdTXkUBl56WrNumU1sA7OGpaPIH+1kzW/V4cmx33LicpJcz9cmjPht0XLV1SvAWA0lHMHqlmkR7aKijAnrKJPdA2eeLv1lns0CAuhyBNqugccMgrODiBugWEyp70zi/FkhH4chDZ5SA+pstfRXyCvwJH34= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WReLQCTV5EBuz+eeDRENs0x/aEmGxAXuYBvwcB7rL9RGuQZpw+q5F+42P0igOAVLAktRpB5vt5V78XjYdp2r3bEqy16eq3AM2Cfjyr7CtBcGkS1gWehHuDBZ1wpgngskhepyAUXdEMuw7jdbH6TTLWnEt3FLT+l7F0yM6EzCePU= Received: by 10.65.107.10 with SMTP id j10mr9746249qbm.1181669178675; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:26:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.251.19 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:26:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8cd1ed20706121026y4d3bf460x1fad10cfb9782a99@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:26:18 +1200 From: "Kent Fredric" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] why multiple versions of java-config, automake, and autoconf? In-Reply-To: <20070612134944.GB21610@nibiru.local> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200706071754.53896.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> <20070608124654.GA765@nibiru.local> <200706091246.04667.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> <20070612134944.GB21610@nibiru.local> X-Archives-Salt: a6c06ae9-2295-484c-bfc5-bb0dc8a372af X-Archives-Hash: 05f112bd85e4a56c8dd348ec5a58dc31 On 6/13/07, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Okay, this isn't really about slots vs. no slots, but shows that > slots are not necessary. > > > cu Well, IMO everything should be slotted 100% every version able to be installed in parallel, and packages depend on version, and versions with no depends are obviously not needed and cleaned out ,,, but we'll have to agree to dissagree ;) -- Kent ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x| print "enNOSPicAMreil kdrtf@gma.com"[(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}' -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list