Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

["Kent Fredric" <kentfredric@gmail.com>]

On 6/9/07, Dale <dalek@exceedtech.net> wrote:
> Kent Fredric wrote:
> > On 6/9/07, Zachary Grafton <zachary.grafton@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> >>
> >> Maybe someone should submit a bug report....
> >
> > http://www.xkcd.com/c258.html
> >
> > I tried .   Critical bug, but was considered  'invalid' by the
> > prayer-wranglers.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Let me guess, Jakub closed it?  LOL
>
> Can I also assume he decided to stay?  I read he was leaving a while back.
>
> Dale
>
> :-)  :-)  :-)


Lemme be perfectly clear here. Jakub does a very good job of what he
does, and gentoo IMO does suffer a bit when hes not here.  Bugs need
wrangling, or the right devs dont get even told they're there, and
Jakub does a legendary job of redirecting them to the right place.
Its like having an email server with only one ingoing email address
and having to get a human to redirect all the mails by hand to the
right inboxes.

He is like gentoo. Not perfect, but better than all the other choices :)
Gentoo does tend to get a little pissy sometimes, but what can you expect  =)

-- 
Kent
ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x|
print "enNOSPicAMreil kdrtf@gma.com"[(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}'
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list