From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E79139083 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 04:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF22CE0FC5; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 04:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yb0-x22f.google.com (mail-yb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94408E0F3E for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 04:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 184so2489918ybw.12 for ; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 20:41:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=ySl7ZhqUzHZ2fhxIQbQ/QB6uigqtLBlc38d0rzZdwPY=; b=szzAtDtEV7pbwyKuY48rWGokUMYjplbhzxaiywRWGPAgEHj8bUjAIXp9M44IzXGzlQ Ro1lRTabo34H7ljsHq5St7idk/x8cTuKDnIq272roN3/W38yQ9fVsh0iAOh4Bd/jc62j 2crp/JTw8D7flWfKSZR+syTQQzcXrC+REAudRm/0bjCk3FUGTf+iK5LwQwUxKu7bPpS7 5CI7lMS3Jawho3OK3uXNhRgeTEIvl8XQR3zh2t1OvEk5pQ2m7iRPZMIRhCtKfkOL5AxL gevwHUAVvFQ2oo4LjonYnQCJONnFFG+iMqXr6cpj8jaZ4qBIO6FkbAGjBBujTzFXvA3S kGZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ySl7ZhqUzHZ2fhxIQbQ/QB6uigqtLBlc38d0rzZdwPY=; b=KTC40QJ5Ui1TSevJeGReskvpOkM1E7utZuia9PtKu0tVn36nyexuULz1sZbbnKoMUT YtOmRAOe1VwxuSMSLRifZJYe/X/GvAXDqBoQf3vnomEJEhMxmTx6Th3hJ2dpnErOsevX f+Hi43klS29f+0SBRYoP6R3PCBt2m8AxCtvuEAoSgungfFzW/RVNl20c7FVvTk/XsRoZ 2meC82NPEo5oIIO1+TE0A5ClSIUE2jMyinnXn6vxWraApPyM/fh8FQraXbOBAdBzSu3M CJucull6VupyB6NJblkIGDD5iW0EUoAkRVqso0e2viYsMUSFH6sT5zmDVpnKaNYKhQRJ 2FVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLiDtGnxCCEjJroZ6W+Vu90bO9H+kjNUNp/JK00Rrv8OG3VCNlj MlNbC3WI3IumrHnF0At8/9BsyA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMY88LhnVzYpCbcuhmeCDG4huvR0qY1ybvJwKiUUAiqyawRJSvOE9rUcFhePGVqIBc0q8ypYdA== X-Received: by 10.37.233.7 with SMTP id n7mr10180731ybd.96.1512621660808; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 20:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-93-225.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.93.225]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x1sm2087475ywe.100.2017.12.06.20.40.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Dec 2017 20:40:59 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] switch to profile 17.0 complete, completely painless To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <4e95ea2f-2b41-787e-669c-96f2d0c7380a@gmail.com> From: Dale Message-ID: <8b4fa9b5-2751-a823-0864-00ad0dffb98c@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 22:40:58 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------7453EA15919D93AC8C77A1F9" X-Archives-Salt: 402c2068-1349-4d15-9983-14f3c9ba174b X-Archives-Hash: c8be8b5243a438b499278969574bff7d This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------7453EA15919D93AC8C77A1F9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote: > > > 2017-12-06 2:18 GMT-05:00 Dale >: > > Raffaele Belardi wrote: > > One (~x86) LXDE system completed the switch with no problem, the > other (~amd64) built all > > except two packaged (sdlmame and torcs) which did not build with > gcc-7.2 even before the > > switch to 17.0. > > > > Gentoo devs and arch testers did a good job as usual. > > > > I'll do the switch on the Gnome system in the next days but up > to now I can say that the > > switch to 17.0 is a _lot_ less painful than switching major > compiler version. > > > > raffaele > > > > > > > I'm having trouble with these: > > net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200 > dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.9.3 > net-libs/webkit-gtk > > Those three, I've had to adjust the USE flags and it may or may not be > profile switch related.  If I had to guess, it just happened to pop up > and isn't related to the switch.  They are back in the rear > compiling as > I type.  > > > ​Dale, > > How did you merge qtwebengine? > ​ > > -- >   Andrés Becerra Sandoval > You may have already fixed this but the way I got it to work was this: -system-icu I added that to my make.conf USE line and it seems to compile fine, but with that disabled for now.  Dale :-)  :-) --------------7453EA15919D93AC8C77A1F9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote:


2017-12-06 2:18 GMT-05:00 Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>:
Raffaele Belardi wrote:
> One (~x86) LXDE system completed the switch with no problem, the other (~amd64) built all
> except two packaged (sdlmame and torcs) which did not build with gcc-7.2 even before the
> switch to 17.0.
>
> Gentoo devs and arch testers did a good job as usual.
>
> I'll do the switch on the Gnome system in the next days but up to now I can say that the
> switch to 17.0 is a _lot_ less painful than switching major compiler version.
>
> raffaele
>
>


I'm having trouble with these:

net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200
dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.9.3
net-libs/webkit-gtk

Those three, I've had to adjust the USE flags and it may or may not be
profile switch related.  If I had to guess, it just happened to pop up
and isn't related to the switch.  They are back in the rear compiling as
I type. 


​Dale,

How did you merge qtwebengine?
​

--
  Andrés Becerra Sandoval



You may have already fixed this but the way I got it to work was this:

-system-icu

I added that to my make.conf USE line and it seems to compile fine, but with that disabled for now. 

Dale

:-)  :-)
--------------7453EA15919D93AC8C77A1F9--