From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-63988-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1Ho3vy-0004j7-UH
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 20:47:51 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4FKjMOj021620;
Tue, 15 May 2007 20:45:22 GMT
Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.225])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4FKamnW009878
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 15 May 2007 20:36:48 GMT
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id x7so281660nzc
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 15 May 2007 13:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=VU83DIXaHDqt7VFRftvcm0TW8sgYPu3u8K28O3Ex9kd0kjbCSVzGaDYvIKHebfFhxpnDmaSG2GnEum1nQyLzoUItvjCQvVVZlm1TpkgbHHZiIE8PgplOz4mghkWylvRbexlLQGHtJ4z1jafmAWEC8GbmBYAu6NvYSm+7s7BpSAw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=nqFfCKzi0PDTM0GTRCm08B/fdETk4u2f75P/Tz3dwxn/PSnXw+JeuVHKfjTjSqrOVRgIF+S6NEaCEiOPfbb5h2NKpVtMJ+8T8kC56cPcUduaJ3L79/7ncw6bzfR5B17Gmb+OUT2xskf7TKvdO4Zqh+BPuAbW0LKsJN3/qBV28XA=
Received: by 10.114.75.1 with SMTP id x1mr1759935waa.1179261407521;
Tue, 15 May 2007 13:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.169.7 with HTTP; Tue, 15 May 2007 13:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8a0c7af10705151336h407046bcn54647743de0ec0f3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:36:47 -0300
From: "Daniel van Ham Colchete" <daniel.colchete@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Remote administration of a server
In-Reply-To: <200705132116.23992.mike@gaima.co.uk>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_10805_8694558.1179261407090"
References: <8a0c7af10705141142u5a251a8fkfe90723e7952337e@mail.gmail.com>
<200705132116.23992.mike@gaima.co.uk>
X-Archives-Salt: 1bbdb786-50ff-4b52-bc06-71a8228b58cd
X-Archives-Hash: 3bd7800fa9bbab70cf648e7fef019b8d
------=_Part_10805_8694558.1179261407090
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On 5/13/07, Mike Williams <mike@gaima.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Monday 14 May 2007 19:42:45 Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote:
> > To solve this, I'm seeing 2 options right now. The first would be buyin=
g
> a
> > KVM-over-IP unit. But, a KVM-over-IP unit with the number of ports I
> need
> > is expensive, almost as expensive as the servers it will be connected.
>
> We use a Belkin KVM-IP box with 2 sets of ports. One set for a local
> keyboard/monitor/mouse, and one to a 16 port Belkin KVM.
> The IP box can handle upto 64 KVM ports, and the KVM can daisy chain to a=
n
> extent I don't know.
> You don't say how many servers, but 64 is quite a lot.
> I believe Belkin do a 4 channel IP box too.
> Total cost was, I think, ~=A3700. To remotely manage >16 servers, peanuts=
.
That's cheap! I'm looking at their page right now. And 64 is enough for sur=
e
(at least during the first year).
------=_Part_10805_8694558.1179261407090
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
<br><br><div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 5/13/07, <b class=3D"gmail_send=
ername">Mike Williams</b> <<a href=3D"mailto:mike@gaima.co.uk">mike@gaim=
a.co.uk</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"bor=
der-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-=
left: 1ex;">
On Monday 14 May 2007 19:42:45 Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote:<br>> To so=
lve this, I'm seeing 2 options right now. The first would be buying a<b=
r>> KVM-over-IP unit. But, a KVM-over-IP unit with the number of ports I=
need
<br>> is expensive, almost as expensive as the servers it will be connec=
ted.<br><br>We use a Belkin KVM-IP box with 2 sets of ports. One set for a =
local<br>keyboard/monitor/mouse, and one to a 16 port Belkin KVM.<br>The IP=
box can handle upto 64 KVM ports, and the KVM can daisy chain to an
<br>extent I don't know.<br>You don't say how many servers, but 64 =
is quite a lot.<br>I believe Belkin do a 4 channel IP box too.<br>Total cos=
t was, I think, ~=A3700. To remotely manage >16 servers, peanuts.</block=
quote>
<div><br>That's cheap! I'm looking at their page right now. And 64 =
is enough for sure (at least during the first year).</div></div>
------=_Part_10805_8694558.1179261407090--
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list