From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-57464-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1H1Be2-0007mH-CZ
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:07:18 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l0113V8g024528;
Mon, 1 Jan 2007 01:03:31 GMT
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0111Q9b002616
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 01:01:26 GMT
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so2992788pyi
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:01:25 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=DxDzwm7MbE9575JBnnBDHbiy9DXDSq9lavobA5cEMOkKqaEZLFXEKgLJTyJUy+LL8fJsa9JzOiGFj61y7jGwQxErM+2WMLl87z2u/WsRljsYa5qcgzEAYRQhdNzKH4t5K7LHtGK5glVuIdRI0erOzyPfcDfusPlpaglv6OkhDBA=
Received: by 10.35.9.15 with SMTP id m15mr1621479pyi.1167613285896;
Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:01:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.35.30.16 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:01:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <89646b4a0612311701q5b705e09n425c9c8e5a01a4c9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:01:25 -0600
From: "Mike Myers" <fluffymikey@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: anti-portage wreckage?
In-Reply-To: <89646b4a0612311529p36468a62yebf35860f00da4b6@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_62016_5600272.1167613285841"
References: <89646b4a0612241752i127b3c29iec9f88687085c6c@mail.gmail.com>
<loom.20061227T195914-183@post.gmane.org> <4597AA7A.2070302@planet.nl>
<200612311341.12472.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
<89646b4a0612311529p36468a62yebf35860f00da4b6@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: a871ee93-5afa-461d-aeaa-bf8050baea86
X-Archives-Hash: 1e32f591e62d9d40e437970301ae8b3c
------=_Part_62016_5600272.1167613285841
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
I just wanted to add something to the original post.
I've recently began experimenting with Debian and noticed their updating
system is exactly like what I was asking about. Basically, there's package
updates, and then there's distro updates. Why is it unreasonable for Gentoo
to have something like this? I think it would help Gentoo a lot in the
server market, where scalability is important.
------=_Part_62016_5600272.1167613285841
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
I just wanted to add something to the original post.<br><br>I've recently began experimenting with Debian and noticed their updating system is exactly like what I was asking about. Basically, there's package updates, and then there's distro updates. Why is it unreasonable for Gentoo to have something like this? I think it would help Gentoo a lot in the server market, where scalability is important.
<br>
------=_Part_62016_5600272.1167613285841--
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list