From: Javier Martinez <tazok.id0@gmail.com>
To: Immolo <immoloism@googlemail.com>
Cc: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Recommended CPU and cooling system
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 20:39:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <89466e02-1c6b-4a45-8d8f-c332a07a648e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHfWF5=W1E5LmJxOCceo2Lq8vF2iSORX07TjQ8GUjYXF2B7XKQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3597 bytes --]
And also RAIDs are unnecessary because none of your drives died. Isn't it?
The evidence says that harddisks died more and sooner than RAM modules,
this is a fact that you can check asking your knowns. So logic says that
its better use RAM for this kind of tasks than harddisks.
El 24/7/25 a las 20:33, Immolo escribió:
> Based on the evidence of multiple computers running different types of
> storage for the last 2 decades. No I don't think its worth using tmpfs
> for portage as I've seen no benefit to drive heath nor speed increase.
>
> Immolo
>
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2025, 19:29 Javier Martinez, <tazok.id0@gmail.com
> <mailto:tazok.id0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> So, shall we stop using RAIDs then because your drives still alive then?
>
> The question is to use tmpfs for /var/tmp/portage or not. I think yes
> without doubt because you increase the lifespam of your drive. Maybe 1
> month, 2, 5 whatever. It will last more time that if you don't do.
>
> Also you have to make it properly, without swapping to disk. But I have
> the opinion that if you can use it you should use it.
>
>
> El 24/7/25 a las 20:20, Immolo escribió:
> > And this changes what I said how?
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Jul 2025, 19:17 Javier Martinez, <tazok.id0@gmail.com
> <mailto:tazok.id0@gmail.com>
> > <mailto:tazok.id0@gmail.com <mailto:tazok.id0@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > El 24/7/25 a las 19:56, Immolo escribió:
> > > > If you don't use RAM as tmpfs maybe your harddisk will
> live 5
> > years,
> > >
> > > I must have some defective drives or something as my IDE
> drives
> > from the
> > > 90s are still going.....
> > >
> > > As for nvmes, I brought mine in 2017 and is currently
> showing `Data
> > > Units Written : 192018934 (98.31 TB)`
> > > I don't do anything too intense, just a weekly emptyree
> rebuild
> > of world
> > > using the latest GCC snapshot to help track early bugs.
> > >
> > > If you are worried about earlier SSDs then my little 60GB
> SSD I
> > bought
> > > in 2008 is also doing fine as a Gentoo machine rootfs.
> > >
> > > If you have any other questions about hardware life cycles
> then
> > please
> > > free to ask.
> > >
> > > immolo
> >
> > IDE are mechanicals units, his lifespan depends entirely of
> mechanics
> > components, SSD not. It can be a cuestion of luck, but I have
> lost a
> > lot
> > of drives, most of them standard mechanics IDE,SATA drives.
> >
> > Lastly one SEAGATE of two TB mechanic bought at the same time
> that one
> > SSD of 512GB died. The SSD not yet, but the SEAGATE had a lot
> more use
> > than the other. I protected this SSD from writings but as you
> can see:
> >
> > Data Units Read: 78.061.867 [39,9 TB]
> > Data Units Written: 35.723.270 [18,2 TB]
> >
> >
> > It has his work done
> >
> > If you protect your drives his lifespans will get increased.
> But you
> > have to take care of them
> >
>
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3145 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-24 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAHfWF5=MJFzpGAfg=u9wquX66udEUs5TTnZ-h1V8H88YA+r=DQ@mail.gmail.com>
2025-07-24 18:17 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Recommended CPU and cooling system Javier Martinez
2025-07-24 18:23 ` Michael
[not found] ` <CAHfWF5kG5pN3naJdHkMcVsPgZVe9TkqY2OzP2N5FDV69Sr_NkA@mail.gmail.com>
2025-07-24 18:28 ` Javier Martinez
[not found] ` <CAHfWF5=W1E5LmJxOCceo2Lq8vF2iSORX07TjQ8GUjYXF2B7XKQ@mail.gmail.com>
2025-07-24 18:39 ` Javier Martinez [this message]
2025-07-24 14:43 [gentoo-user] " Rahul Sandhu
2025-07-24 15:42 ` Javier Martinez
2025-07-24 16:07 ` [gentoo-user] " Nuno Silva
2025-07-24 16:19 ` Javier Martinez
2025-07-25 8:59 ` Nuno Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=89466e02-1c6b-4a45-8d8f-c332a07a648e@gmail.com \
--to=tazok.id0@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=immoloism@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox