From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-65875-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1I3CpQ-0003kF-Fo
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:19:41 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5QFHPqf019426;
Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:17:25 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5QFBPG0011457
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:11:26 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A22645EB
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:11:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: 1.803
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.803 required=5.5 tests=[NO_REAL_NAME=0.55,
RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Bz0zOnE0uAkz for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:11:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAF26505C
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:11:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1I3CPd-0008TI-48
for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:53:01 +0200
Received: from 75.63.51.175 ([75.63.51.175])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:53:01 +0200
Received: from reader by 75.63.51.175 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:53:01 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: reader@newsguy.com
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: kernel heat warnings at low temps
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:27:30 -0500
Organization: Still searching...
Message-ID: <87vedan63x.fsf@newsguy.com>
References: <87bqf3g1qm.fsf@newsguy.com>
<200706260037.22338.wonko@wonkology.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.63.51.175
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:79RiAc30u0azZiHmoyAKSbEK6KE=
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: ee31c4e5-2b97-4e94-bb39-62264c8a1fe1
X-Archives-Hash: 3d5ab85c234fc5bedfd16cbcbdbb02c4
Alex Schuster <wonko@wonkology.org> writes:
[...]
> What has the hdd temp to do with cpu tmeprature?
[...]
> hddtemp and cputemp are completly and totally unrelated.
[...]
First ... thanks for the other tips..
I think you fellows may have this a bit wrong. I have three video
editing desktops all running win xp. On them I use a piece of
software called `Hardware sensors monitor' or Hmonitor.
I've noticed over time (mnths) that when the cpu gets hot, the hdd are
also at elevated temps. Maybe not critical but well above where the
run normally.
This is on three different midtower boxes, so I have surmized that
although the heating of cpu may not be related mechanically to hdd
temp, in fact they rise and fall together due probably to close
proximity and being contained in same box.
I realize this is not a definitive experiment but for my uses it does
work like that.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list