From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fkx6u-0000QE-Uc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 05:49:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4U5lh6l008767; Tue, 30 May 2006 05:47:43 GMT Received: from newton.gmurray.org.uk (newton.gmurray.org.uk [81.2.114.237]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4U5fVUb015501 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 05:41:31 GMT Received-SPF: pass (newton.gmurray.org.uk: domain of graham@gmurray.org.uk designates 127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) receiver=newton.gmurray.org.uk; client-ip=127.0.0.1; helo=newton.gmurray.org.uk; envelope-from=graham@gmurray.org.uk; x-software=spfmilter 0.97 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.0.0; Received: from newton.gmurray.org.uk (graham@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newton.gmurray.org.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4U5f9pM025596 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 06:41:09 +0100 X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v0.5.0 newton.gmurray.org.uk k4U5f9pM025596 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmurray.org.uk; s=in200507; t=1148967670; bh=gUU51MgVeD+d8w5HFS8MITcRXPI=; h=Received: X-Authentication-Warning:From:To:Subject:References:X-Hashcash: Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=A nbX3TpRb7h9sVvvFxhPWem3CQNkdM46JKKFtMC1g4plPEyDYGafoiWwryXDvU73jvwR mqFyJDCfXsL1FjfTPw== Received: (from graham@localhost) by newton.gmurray.org.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k4U5f95M025595; Tue, 30 May 2006 06:41:09 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: newton.gmurray.org.uk: graham set sender to graham@gmurray.org.uk using -f From: Graham Murray To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice build failed. References: <7573e9640605282217h447d62a4ldca7659c75571efc@mail.gmail.com> <20060529.191703.74749441.Meino.Cramer@gmx.de> <1148930066.9761.21.camel@sputnik886.ruz-net> <20060529.213116.74735175.Meino.Cramer@gmx.de> <1148940992.9761.59.camel@sputnik886.ruz-net> X-Hashcash: 1:22:060530:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org::MD1ESYoXGDbjyoly:0000000000000000000000000000000008S4Z Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 06:41:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1148940992.9761.59.camel@sputnik886.ruz-net> (Matthias Langer's message of "Tue, 30 May 2006 00:16:32 +0200") Message-ID: <87u0789iiy.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Archives-Salt: 42d56b29-37fa-452f-b44a-fa7dbc0e01a7 X-Archives-Hash: 57157cabb249deb1366227f959936ef9 Matthias Langer writes: > Besides, by looking at the terminal while merging packages, you will > soon notice, that lot's of packages add their very own CFLAGS to your > default ones. For example mplayer or xine-lib was compiled with '-O3' on > my system, allthough i have '-O2' in my CFLAGS. (As far as i know, "gcc > -O3 -O2" == "gcc -O3"). Where packages do this, should they not filter out the appropriate flags from the user's CFLAGS and substitute their flags rather than having both flags on the command line? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list