From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L2u4t-0001YI-Ok for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:55:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FDC9E0230; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78211E0230 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3DD6477D for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:55:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.509 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.509 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LY5OfwnjBdQk for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A743B643A4 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L2u4Y-0001GY-2a for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:54:50 +0000 Received: from c-98-215-178-6.hsd1.in.comcast.net ([98.215.178.6]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:54:50 +0000 Received: from reader by c-98-215-178-6.hsd1.in.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:54:50 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Harry Putnam Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: tools currently available for update of etc files after updates Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:54:42 -0600 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: <87tza3xwq5.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <87skpu2uda.fsf@newsguy.com> <87iqqoh9nv.fsf@newsguy.com> <200811160901.05404.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-215-178-6.hsd1.in.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:UDYaV/ehON4EVyCIQ/AGFd9UzRQ= Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 7c3f0f2a-37e7-4814-a382-068c2e2c4b1b X-Archives-Hash: e826389a9b72f7504044229e3374e8c0 Dirk Heinrichs writes: > Am Sonntag, 16. November 2008 00:05:56 schrieb Harry Putnam: > >> I did try `cfg-update' but I thought it was really slow. > > Slow? For me it's blazingly fast. I opened this thread back up to eat a little crow. Now that some of my config files have been thru cfg-updates process once. I see new updates processed literally in the blink of an eye. So I now agree that `blazingly' is quite appropriate.