From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-150148-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21211381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:27:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5CBE21C035;
	Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:27:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.cs.nyu.edu (SMTP.CS.NYU.EDU [128.122.49.97])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D1E21C02D
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:27:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from newlap.localdomain (ool-182de1a5.dyn.optonline.net [24.45.225.165])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by smtp.cs.nyu.edu (8.14.3/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7RLRVT0008227
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:27:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by newlap.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 7E8F7A0426; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:27:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: gottlieb@nyu.edu
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] portage 2.2 in ~amd64
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:27:30 -0400
Message-ID: <87r4de964d.fsf@nyu.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Archives-Salt: c542724a-217d-49b7-bdba-191b030e01df
X-Archives-Hash: 88f75ce00111bb719967deb38e89fa9e

I was away for two weeks.  I just resynced and see that 2.2.1 is now in
testing (and my current version 2.1.13.1 is not in the tree).

Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1, all the commands
from 2.1.x.y will continue to work?  I know that several readers have
used 2.2 for years with success.

thanks,
allan