From: gottlieb@nyu.edu
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] sys-power/upower with systemd
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:33:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r42c78vl.fsf@nyu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140624100124.700559aa@marcec> (Marc Joliet's message of "Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:01:24 +0200")
On Tue, Jun 24 2014, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:39:13 -0400
> schrieb gottlieb@nyu.edu:
>
>> I think I had first misinterpreted the news msg, but want to be sure I
>> do understand it correctly now.
>>
>> The message ends with
>>
>> All non-systemd users are recommended to choose between:
>> # emerge --oneshot --noreplace 'sys-power/upower-pm-utils'
>> or
>> # emerge --oneshot --noreplace '>=sys-power/upower-0.99.0'
>> However, all systemd users are recommended to stay with sys-power/upower.
>>
>> I first read "stay with sys-power/upower" to mean systemd users should
>> NOT do any of the two options for non-systemd users and let portage "do
>> its thing". However, portage want to replace upower with
>> upower-pm-utils, which I am pretty sure is not intended for systemd
>> users.
>>
>> Is the proper reading of the news message, that the systemd users should
>> use the second option available for non-systemd users? Specifically am
>> I to execute
>>
>> # emerge --oneshot --noreplace '>=sys-power/upower-0.99.0'
>>
>> ?
>
> Um, personally, I think the message is extremely clear: non-systemd users
> should choose between the first two options, and systemd users should just
> stick with plain upower, regardless of version (although there is only one
> ATM, the older one is masked now).
I am embarrassed to say that I am still having trouble with this upower
business.
My profile is .../gnome/systemd and I have the
init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd line GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX so I am using
systemd.
right now I have sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3 installed (the only version
below 0.99) and sys-power/upower-pm-utils NOT installed.
If I try to update world (see below), portage wants to install
sys-power/upower-pm-utils and uninstall sys-power/upower.
The output (below) suggests that gnome-shell requires this, but I read
the gnome-shell ebuild as permitting my current
sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3 as an alternative.
If I try to
# emerge --oneshot --noreplace '>=sys-power/upower-0.99.0'
I get a conflict since several gnome packages (e.g. gnome-shell)
explicitly want <upower-0.99
Am I supposed to package-mask sys-power/upower-pm-utils?
The results shown are on a stable amd64 system (my previous msg
concerned another system that I am slowly converting from testing to
stable, but this msg only involves a fully stable system).
thanks in advance,
allan
================================================================
allan ~ # emerge --keep-going --update --changed-use @world
These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] x11-wm/sawfish-1.9.1-r2 [1.9.1-r1] USE="emacs%* nls -xinerama" 2,556 kB
[nomerge ] gnome-base/gnome-3.10.0:2.0 USE="bluetooth cdr classic cups extras -accessibility"
[nomerge ] gnome-base/gnome-shell-3.10.4-r2 USE="bluetooth i18n networkmanager (-openrc-force)" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7"
[nomerge ] sys-power/upower-pm-utils-0.9.23-r2 USE="introspection -ios"
[blocks b ] sys-power/upower ("sys-power/upower" is blocking sys-power/upower-pm-utils-0.9.23-r2)
[uninstall ] sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3 USE="introspection -doc -ios"
[ebuild N ] sys-power/upower-pm-utils-0.9.23-r2 USE="introspection -ios" 0 kB
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-26 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-24 0:39 [gentoo-user] sys-power/upower with systemd gottlieb
2014-06-24 8:01 ` Marc Joliet
2014-06-24 8:08 ` Helmut Jarausch
2014-06-24 8:28 ` Marc Joliet
2014-06-24 10:09 ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-24 10:30 ` Marc Joliet
2014-06-24 11:05 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-06-26 1:33 ` gottlieb [this message]
2014-06-26 7:57 ` Marc Joliet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r42c78vl.fsf@nyu.edu \
--to=gottlieb@nyu.edu \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox