public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gottlieb@nyu.edu
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] sys-power/upower with systemd
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:33:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r42c78vl.fsf@nyu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140624100124.700559aa@marcec> (Marc Joliet's message of "Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:01:24 +0200")

On Tue, Jun 24 2014, Marc Joliet wrote:

> Am Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:39:13 -0400
> schrieb gottlieb@nyu.edu:
>
>> I think I had first misinterpreted the news msg, but want to be sure I
>> do understand it correctly now.
>> 
>> The message ends with
>> 
>>   All non-systemd users are recommended to choose between:
>>   # emerge --oneshot --noreplace 'sys-power/upower-pm-utils'
>>   or
>>   # emerge --oneshot --noreplace '>=sys-power/upower-0.99.0'
>>   However, all systemd users are recommended to stay with sys-power/upower.
>> 
>> I first read "stay with sys-power/upower" to mean systemd users should
>> NOT do any of the two options for non-systemd users and let portage "do
>> its thing".  However, portage want to replace upower with
>> upower-pm-utils, which I am pretty sure is not intended for systemd
>> users.
>> 
>> Is the proper reading of the news message, that the systemd users should
>> use the second option available for non-systemd users?  Specifically am
>> I to execute
>> 
>>     # emerge --oneshot --noreplace '>=sys-power/upower-0.99.0'
>> 
>> ?
>
> Um, personally, I think the message is extremely clear: non-systemd users
> should choose between the first two options, and systemd users should just
> stick with plain upower, regardless of version (although there is only one
> ATM, the older one is masked now).

I am embarrassed to say that I am still having trouble with this upower
business.
My profile is .../gnome/systemd and I have the
init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd line GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX so I am using
systemd.

right now I have sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3 installed (the only version
below 0.99) and sys-power/upower-pm-utils NOT installed.

If I try to update world (see below), portage wants to install
sys-power/upower-pm-utils and uninstall sys-power/upower.

The output (below) suggests that gnome-shell requires this, but I read
the gnome-shell ebuild as permitting my current
sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3 as an alternative.

If I try to
    # emerge --oneshot --noreplace '>=sys-power/upower-0.99.0'
I get a conflict since several gnome packages (e.g. gnome-shell)
explicitly want <upower-0.99

Am I supposed to package-mask sys-power/upower-pm-utils?

The results shown are on a stable amd64 system (my previous msg
concerned another system that I am slowly converting from testing to
stable, but this msg only involves a fully stable system).

thanks in advance,
allan

================================================================

allan ~ # emerge  --keep-going --update --changed-use @world

These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:

Calculating dependencies... done!

[ebuild     U  ] x11-wm/sawfish-1.9.1-r2 [1.9.1-r1] USE="emacs%* nls -xinerama" 2,556 kB
[nomerge       ] gnome-base/gnome-3.10.0:2.0  USE="bluetooth cdr classic cups extras -accessibility" 
[nomerge       ]  gnome-base/gnome-shell-3.10.4-r2  USE="bluetooth i18n networkmanager (-openrc-force)" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7" 
[nomerge       ]   sys-power/upower-pm-utils-0.9.23-r2  USE="introspection -ios" 
[blocks b      ]    sys-power/upower ("sys-power/upower" is blocking sys-power/upower-pm-utils-0.9.23-r2)
[uninstall     ]     sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3  USE="introspection -doc -ios" 
[ebuild  N     ]   sys-power/upower-pm-utils-0.9.23-r2  USE="introspection -ios" 0 kB


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-26  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-24  0:39 [gentoo-user] sys-power/upower with systemd gottlieb
2014-06-24  8:01 ` Marc Joliet
2014-06-24  8:08   ` Helmut Jarausch
2014-06-24  8:28     ` Marc Joliet
2014-06-24 10:09       ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-24 10:30         ` Marc Joliet
2014-06-24 11:05     ` Alan McKinnon
2014-06-26  1:33   ` gottlieb [this message]
2014-06-26  7:57     ` Marc Joliet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r42c78vl.fsf@nyu.edu \
    --to=gottlieb@nyu.edu \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox